Results 1 to 40 of 92

Thread: What's my type (other than blondes)?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,953
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DonutTaganes View Post
    You're absolutely wrong on this. There's not nearly enough information in my video for you to get an Enneagram typing, the Enneagram is all about one's inner narrative and repressed self. It takes a lot to get to someone's Enneagram. Sociotype is about how one carries oneself in the day-to-day and is much easier to ascertain visually/superficially.

    My two best friends are 7s and the delineation is ridiculously clear.
    And now you are supervising Pink's Te, because she's not being objective about information and information regarding you (the facts and logic).
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    30
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Doesn't it seem unlikely that an LSE would have more negative feelings around Si and Fi than they do around Ni and Ti?

  3. #3
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,953
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DonutTaganes View Post
    Doesn't it seem unlikely that an LSE would have more negative feelings around Si and Fi than they do around Ni and Ti?
    well you like every non dialyzed LSE find Fi to be boring while not understanding the nature and purpose of Fi. and you find your own ways to relax despite high Extroversion (head sets, tune out).
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    30
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That doesn't account for my much more positive relationships with what you're saying are my non-valued Introverted functions.

  5. #5
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,953
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DonutTaganes View Post
    That doesn't account for my much more positive relationships with what you're saying are my non-valued Introverted functions.
    I'm not sure what you associate with Fi other than "boring"
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •