Don't take this stuff too seriously, it's about as accurate and useful as astrology.
But then again some people on here think astrology is very accurate and useful.
Don't take this stuff too seriously, it's about as accurate and useful as astrology.
But then again some people on here think astrology is very accurate and useful.
And some pretend they dont think its useful but they still stick aroundOriginally Posted by Singu
What function is this everybody????
Don’t you have anything better to do than to pretend to be ESTP?
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Idk
There's a lot more depth and information in typology than astrology. There's also many theories out there. I'm not saying any of them are 100% true but there's a clear difference between typology and astrology.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
