@Sol I think you should revisit that typing.
@Sol I think you should revisit that typing.
The most strong argument is that I get IR effects which fit to LSE much better than any other type. I type alot and get confirmations of this for years.Originally Posted by thehotelambush
You can't feel what I feel to people to understand me. But you may look my bloggers/actors lists. If I'd was LSI, then most typed there as E*I were E*E and vice versa. I feel more comfortably from typed as base Fi types - I like those people much more.
He’s not LSI
Too much idealistic dreaming to be connected to strong reality
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
