Thank you.
I too will bookmark this page and if anyone ever desires to read something that defines INTp I will show them this and explain that this is a repeat of the same question, posed in a different way, posed because the question is more desirable than any answer because the answer is self evident before the question and therefore vacuous as the soul.
Alright lol, I got a little dramatic with the question about souls, although I think such a concept wasn't altogether undeserving of such a response, but do you really think I'm an ILI based on the overall content?Originally Posted by Smilex
No, I was joking every time I answered this question previously.
To clarify. I feel you don't really want the answer, so I am now supplying you with more doubt.
Last edited by Smilex; 04-24-2019 at 08:06 PM.
Sorry, I still don't get you. Were you just taking the piss out of the questionnaire? About how repetitive some questions were, maybe?No, I was joking every time I answered this question previously.
@Smilex, what makes you think I don't want an answer lol? I've posted four questionnaires with the intention of ascertaining my type. If anything, it's just desperation now.
Last edited by Phantom; 04-24-2019 at 08:31 PM.
I have a question
“16. Who decides what morality is?
Some people feel the need to dictate their perception of morality on other people and they're cunts. No one should decide what some universal morality is.”
Why not?
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I was basically saying that I don't believe in some universal code of ethics that everyone should follow, and it shouldn't be decided by an individual who doesn't necessarily have the best interests of everyone in mind. Even if the intentions are good, morality is so complex and there are so many people that they'll just fail to accommodate everyone. Of course there are things like crime but I think that's self-evident. I guess I'm referring to more nuanced aspects. I'm just annoyed by people who assume they know the right way to live and preach it.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
