Results 1 to 40 of 132

Thread: Socionics isn’t real

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,953
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    @Beautiful sky, I think @Number 9 large makes a positive contribution to the forum. He didn't seek you out to tell you how to behave. You took it upon yourself to criticize his actions.

    One thing that Socionics tells us is that other people have different values that we do. Judging them privately is fine, but trying to censor them is not, as long as they are following the rules of the forum.

    If you can't tolerate someone's views, then use the Ignore function. That's what it is for.

    My LSE mother once told me that my rights stop where the other person's nose begins. It was about the best advice she gave me.
    I don’t understand how him calling people a “B” is okay. It’s not even a joke
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  2. #2
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,398
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beautiful sky View Post
    I don’t understand how him calling people a “B” is okay. It’s not even a joke
    its also not okay to get 7 warnings maritsa maybe u should look into that some more

  3. #3
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,842
    Mentioned
    1603 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beautiful sky View Post
    I don’t understand how him calling people a “B” is okay. It’s not even a joke
    You don't have to understand it. You just have to respect people's viewpoints. Freedom of speech means freedom to express conflicting viewpoints.

    One important thing I'd like to point out, and this affects child-rearing and I know, because I did it, is that there is a huge difference between criticizing a person's actions and criticizing the person. Asking "What is wrong with you" is criticizing the person, not the actions.

    It is the difference between saying "I wish you could do a better job at cleaning your room" and saying "You are a slob." One is negotiable, the other is not.

  4. #4
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,953
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    You don't have to understand it. You just have to respect people's viewpoints. Freedom of speech means freedom to express conflicting viewpoints.

    One important thing I'd like to point out, and this affects child-rearing and I know, because I did it, is that there is a huge difference between criticizing a person's actions and criticizing the person. Asking "What is wrong with you" is criticizing the person, not the actions.

    It is the difference between saying "I wish you could do a better job at cleaning your room" and saying "You are a slob." One is negotiable, the other is not.
    I criticized him because it’s not the first time that he’s rude without any reason or cause to promp the rude behavior
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •