“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I only used the quote to distinguish the perspectives. I am no fan of VI. Thought can be just as shallow, as Wilde says. I think we witness shallow thought and judgment of looks every day on this forum. Beauty is something different... Eye of the beholder and all that, which is what Wilde expresses in so many words. What is not visible can be made visible. People look and think but they don't always see and understand.
I like Oscar too.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I was curious why do you think Magellan's answers could indicate Fe-ignoring or polr. Just a note that I think it is possible that he could be ESI, EII or SLI. However, I don't think that those answers don't directly associate with Fe ignoring or polr, yet, I am still curious about your reasoning.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung