Penélope Cruz Sanchez - Spanish actress and model.
Penélope Cruz Sanchez - Spanish actress and model.
Last edited by silke; 07-14-2014 at 10:26 AM. Reason: updated links
i wanna know about that other eye.
She's probably a Gamlet. Maybe ISFj.
asd
gamlet lol
i thought dosta/dreiser.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
speaking of the russians on russian socionics forums- Did you notice how classy and attractive most of the members are? I thought I was sure to find at least a couple V.I. photos with a person hunched over a barrel of fire.
asd
Gamma or Delta intovert for sure... Prolly IxTp
ISFj sounds right.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
esfp
isfj...
INFP
i think infj.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
ISFj is correct
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
I'm wary of the remark that Russians are Europeans.![]()
INTP/ILI(Ni)![]()
/5w4
"When my time comes, forget the wrong that I've done.
Help me leave behind some reasons to be missed."
I think she is ILE or LII.
It is easier for the eye of a camel to pass through a rich man than for a needle to enter the kingdom of heaven.
You have to say it three times or it's not true.Originally Posted by FDG
loooooooooolOriginally Posted by Rick
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
I'd agree with this but not 100 percent sure. Definitely has played some roles which are completely the opposite though.Originally Posted by Rick
Yes, she seems awfully serious to be ENTp. Maybe INTj. Fwiw, in Volver she was pretty clearly playing an ISTj (or maybe ISFj).Originally Posted by Suomea
Nice fun bags.
ENTp-Tis can be pretty serious, but I think I'd more likely go with INTj.Originally Posted by thehotelambush
I'd say Ti-ILE before LII.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Why?Originally Posted by Gilly
Just my impression. She seems like she has edges; can't say that about many LIIs. But she does seem NT, and probably an Fe preference.Originally Posted by thehotelambush
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
ftr, I don't think this is a good way to distinguish between INTj and ENTp.Originally Posted by Gilly
More, ExTx.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
ISFj
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp![]()
DCNH: Dominant![]()
--> perhaps Normalizing
![]()
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
I know you were referring to Se (there isn't *more* of it), and I don't see how it has anything to do with being extroverted.Originally Posted by Gilly
Yes, there IS more of it. If you know Ti-ILEs, you know that there is quite obviously more of it. And you know that Ti-ILEs are quite obviously more openly aggressive orargumentative.
Extroverts are more likely to react to something they disagree with. If you're sitting at the dinner table, and you say something that both an LII and ILE disagree with, who's more likely to respond? And, if both respond, who's more likely to state her opinion quietly and matter-of-factly, and who is more likely to reply in a challenging or abrasive manner? I think this is a no-brainer, really.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
ENTp-Ti as compared to INTj-Ne, yes. But what about INTj-Ti?Originally Posted by Gilly
Again, this is really rather specific to ENTp-Ti, though I don't disagree.Extroverts are more likely to react to something they disagree with. If you're sitting at the dinner table, and you say something that both an LII and ILE disagree with, who's more likely to respond? And, if both respond, who's more likely to state her opinion quietly and matter-of-factly, and who is more likely to reply in a challenging or abrasive manner? I think this is a no-brainer, really.
Well, I said that she's more likely Ti-ILE, did I not?
I'm not sure I see any difference between Ne and Ti LIIs in this regard.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Eh, I just think that IJ behavior is sometimes mistaken for Se behavior.
o_O;
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
You don't understand what I'm trying to say at all, do you?
Nope, sorry, gonna have to fill me in on this one![]()
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Enforcing rules, maybe?![]()
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Something like that. Standing your ground, not being willing to back down.Originally Posted by Gilly
I changed my mind: I think she could be ISFp![]()
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp![]()
DCNH: Dominant![]()
--> perhaps Normalizing
![]()
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
one of the ISxx types, Si base was my immediate impression
edit: something along the lines of SEI sp/sx 4w3
Last edited by silke; 01-07-2014 at 08:15 AM.
IEI
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Ne/Si valuing
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.