Idk if anyone realizes, but, like, this is a Socionics forum, so anyone using anything but Socionics should find non-Socionics help elsewhere. That said, @
NightHawk stands correct in her statement. While there is no J/P switch among extraverts between MBTI/Socionics, there is obviously one among introverts. In case @
FDG or anyone can't understand the shortened Te version @
NightHawk was so kind to post...
In MBTI, an ESTJ has Te as their dominant function and Si as their auxiliary/secondary function.
In Socionics, an LSE/ESTj has the same functions in the same place.
ESTJ =ESTj/LSE
However:
In MBTI, an ISTJ has Si as their dominant function and Te as their auxiliary/secondary function.
In Socionics, Si-Te equates to an SLI/ISTp.
The switch occurs for introverts and NOT for extraverts.
I feel @
Smilex may not be Te dominate, since Te does well, as in, Te produces/optimizes, it does NOT convolute. This article, and its implications, are literally useless.