you are beta F with good possibility
the main reason for mistyping is the lack of typing skills
you before assigned yourself the type EST*yep, it's funny
you are beta F with good possibility
the main reason for mistyping is the lack of typing skills
you before assigned yourself the type EST*
Originally Posted by Sol
you are beta F with good possibility
the main reason for mistyping is the lack of typing skills
you before assigned yourself the type EST*
And you are a boring delta hoe with 100% possibility.
you assigned myself the type IEI
previously in your profile were: LIE, EIE
now SEE
*sigh*
Fi types care about be polite, to be more emotionally comfortable. they do not start themes with Fe style "marks" in the subject
noobs...
"Fi types care about be polite" - pretty sure that's actually more related to Fe+. SEEs are 4D Se+ and 4D Fe-, not a polite combo if you ask me.
I can remember that you have typed some people here Fi egos that have been far from polite and some who are polite Fe egos. It's not like she is self typing EII. Stick to idealizing/idolizing your duals. They are quite rare as far as you are concerned.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Also pretty strange how Sol (an impolite Fi valuer) makes the claim that all "Fi types" (not just Fi egos) are polite.I can remember that you have typed some people here Fi egos that have been far from polite and some who are polite Fe egos. It's not like she is self typing EII. Stick to idealizing/idolizing your duals. They are quite rare as far as you are concerned.
It's important the degree and conditions. With what was done against being polite - the _possibility_ to have Fi type is low.
Should be taken cases when I typed with assurance to Fi. Then. I may type people which have partly uncommon for a type behavior to that type if VI pointed to that type strong enough to overweight the existence of uncommon behavior. when _other_ factors besides Jung types may predispose to that behavior. as types related nonverbal is _harder_ to be changed by other factors in a way to give _assured_ impression of other type
Also Fe valued types may perceive Fi types worse, - their behavior as lesser morally appropriate. I evaluate by my taste, which may perceive Fi types easier, taking concrete cases and with overal more positive impression.
> and some who are polite Fe egos
It's not so hard to follow nonvalued norms of strong functions, especially in forum texts. To fit better norms of any regions is a normal intention. It's more important what norms people break as that points on good chance those are weak or nonvalued regions.
If a human has F type and breaks much Fi norms - those are doubtful to be valued. With matching results of VI there is more basis to point on this, as this trait has more chance to be correct.
I remember a single case when a girl I typed to ESI with assurance. While the behavior was stably, rather and senseleslly rude on a forum.
Here is Number 9 which behaves strangely for Fi. I suppose SEE for him as most possible, though not sure still. I suspect lesser standard mind or he gets something what rises hooliganism. If VI would pointed to Fe, than I'd gladly thought him so.
Do not remember others. They could fit to be generally polite in my perception.
> Stick to idealizing/idolizing your duals
there are borders which fit to norms. when the borders are stably strongly broken = good factor to suppose another type
previosly was base Fe in the profile. and mb several T types. seems Fi in the first time. with such progress there may appear EIIwhat would be abolute blasphemy
And with that, down goes the English language.It's important the degree and conditions. With what was done against being polite - the _possibility_ to have Fi type is low.
Should be taken cases when I typed with assurance to Fi. Then. I may type people which have partly uncommon for a type behavior to that type if VI pointed to that type strong enough to overweight the existence of uncommon behavior. when _other_ factors besides Jung types may predispose to that behavior. as types related nonverbal is _harder_ to be changed by other factors in a way to give _assured_ impression of other type
Also Fe valued types may perceive Fi types worse, - their behavior as lesser morally appropriate. I evaluate by my taste, which may perceive Fi types easier, taking concrete cases and with overal more positive impression.
> and some who are polite Fe egos
It's not so hard to follow nonvalued norms of strong functions, especially in forum texts. To fit better norms of any regions is a normal intention. It's more important what norms people break as that points on good chance those are weak or nonvalued regions.
If a human has F type and breaks much Fi norms - those are doubtful to be valued. With matching results of VI there is more basis to point on this, as this trait has more chance to be correct.
I remember a single case when a girl I typed to ESI with assurance. While the behavior was stably, rather and senseleslly rude on a forum.
Here is Number 9 which behaves strangely for Fi. I suppose SEE for him as most possible, though not sure still. I suspect lesser standard mind or he gets something what rises hooliganism. If VI would pointed to Fe, than I'd gladly thought him so.
Do not remember others. They could fit to be generally polite in my perception.
> Stick to idealizing/idolizing your duals
there are borders which fit to norms. when the borders are stably strongly broken = good factor to suppose another type
previosly was base Fe in the profile. and mb several T types. seems Fi in the first time. with such progress there may appear EII
This is officially the song for any time anyone gets annoyed with Sol now.
Omg that song is such a bop lol. Very fitting of Sol as well.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote