Anyone who types me as an ILE/ESE/LSE is severely retarded and doesn't understand socionics in the slightest. Anyone who has typed me as these 3 types literally doesn't get an opinion.
Anyone who types me as an ILE/ESE/LSE is severely retarded and doesn't understand socionics in the slightest. Anyone who has typed me as these 3 types literally doesn't get an opinion.
you haven't posted for a month and this is what you return with lol
Yeah, you show them girl!!!
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
Same.
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
I type you ILE, ESE or LSE, not sure which
I type you as EIE for being a drama queen.
Ok then, mr LII.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Those who typed you ILE/ESE/LSE agree that you are extroverted and Ne/Si valuing so I guess I will go with IEE for you
you are beta F with good possibility
the main reason for mistyping is the lack of typing skills
you before assigned yourself the type EST* yep, it's funny
you def seem Se ego, there's a sense of "territory" to you. SEE, SLE or LSI is what I'd guess in no particular order. I'd say your current typing works based on the little I know of you.
@Aylen may I ask why I was censored and warned for politely questioning this user's gender identity, then they come back and start a whole thread just to call people "severely retarded" (and @Heretic 007 "fat fuck") with no consequence?
Does that seem fair to you?
Did I officially warn you or was it someone else? I believe I spoilered some posts from several users in that thread you are talking about because everyone was reporting everyone. It wasn't just one person complaining about the gender issue you brought up in a typing thread.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
It was taken as a personal attack on her by several forum members from what I remember. If you check you will probably see I also spoilered someone's post to you as a personal attack too in that thread. It was not exactly censoring since I didn't delete or alter the content. It is still there for a reason. If you wanted to post your thoughts on transgender issues you could have started a general thread in a non socionics subforum and had a discussion without singling out a new forum member who was just asking to be typed. I am sure she is not the only transgender person on this forum. Beyond that others are also questioning their own gender in other ways.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
So this thread is because you want to control someone else's gender identity via forum posts? That's as absurd as trying to kill someone by shooting your computer screen, and about as polite, and, you'll find, about as beneficial to you. People always have and always will identify as the gender they want to be and that's nothing new. Biology has never even been the sole basis of gender to begin with, but our oversexed society wants people to feel violated. Found another stupid hoe.
Open aggression and insults, how very masculine of you
Calling someone a "stupid hoe" or "fat fuck" is not skirting the rules. Nor is starting a thread solely to attack other members.
If queentiger's behavior in this thread isn't going to be dealt with somehow, then I request that you ban me until further notice. This forum has long lost any of its redeeming qualities.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I mean sure my post was blunt and impolite - but I don't think calling someone who likely doesn't have a disability retarded is the same as making a transphobic attack against an actual trans person on a thread that had nothing to do with it is really the same
and I don't think you realise that (or you do and are just being petty)
and like what I also notice a lot of people online do is they say something transphobic and then get surprised when I actually respond and they get like "b-b-but you can't say that it's rude"
@Aylen the fact remains that open trolls and harassment are going and have gone without consequence on this forum, including the very confused individual who started this thread. Flaming, trolling, and personal attacks are all supposedly against the rules here. Either enforce the rules or get rid of them so we know where the administration stands.
I do my best as a mod to be fair. If anyone thinks I am not then feel free to contact Mu. I am a forum member too with my own opinions. I also have a life outside the forum so I can't be on every little thing. I use my own discretion. Not to mention I come back after being away to find things way more offensive than what she has posted in this thread. I am not playing favorites here since I hardly know QT. She did not get a very warm welcome just because a few people found her directness/openness about how she perceives herself (in the beginning) offensive or something. A lot of you people are adults and should be able to moderate yourselves for the most part. You want an open forum but only when it suits you. Not when someone disagrees with you. By "you" I mean a general you. There are many teens here as well who I tend to give a bit more slack at first. I will use my discretion on how to handle them when I feel they need a reminder of the rules.
Some things just skirt the rules as you know. You were given an opportunity at one time to be a mod but decided not to. You could have interpreted the rules and then enforced them as you saw fit. No one wants to be a mod because it is thankless position to be in and that is why most have given up on any strict modding (other than making sure the forum is not overwhelmed with spam). If you want to be a mod contact Mu and tell him you think you can do a better job. That goes for anyone else who has complaints about the mods. The people who complain the most about mods often find themselves in the middle of conflict. They could easily take care of the problem by controlling their own behavior and not looking for mods to punish anyone that hurts their feelings. I am not say this last part about you. Just an over all observation.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
You know you can't please all the people all the time. To be very blunt you're a case in point. Someone I have seen making snarky comments about mods several times. You troll constantly and get into conflict with various forum members yourself. I have noticed you thanking posts of people trying to troll me or who start conflict with me, jump in to back them up and so on. On any other forum you would have been banned long ago. Take the win before I change my mind on strict modding.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
EIE