Again, it's she.Originally Posted by Beautiful sky
And no, I'm not
Again, it's she.
And no, I'm not
I’m such a cluts yes she and yes ESE. You’re not subdued enough to be LSE. My husband is the serious LSE
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm not ESE or LSE lol. My Si isn't good enough.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
