I predict lots of of people will type you an F type. You seem very animated and emotional.
I predict lots of of people will type you an F type. You seem very animated and emotional.
Idk, I'd actually describe myself as pretty unemotional - I pointed that out multiple times in the video.Originally Posted by COOL AND MANLY
You did.
You also make a lot of hyperbolic statements when you describe yourself and that is by your own admission.
If your actions do not reflect your words why would I take your word seriously?
Couldn't I just turn that back on you though - why should I take your word seriously? I don't think anything in this video was particularly hyperbolic, do you?
Lol
I don't know your type, but I also thought you were emotional/expressive/animated. Yes, I am aware that you pointed that you are not emotional and you dislike emotional people in your video
Hmm, I guess the reason I'm surprised by people saying that is because I've basically been told the opposite for a long time in my life - ya know people telling me I need to be more expressive.I don't know your type, but I also thought you were emotional/expressive/animated. Yes, I am aware that you pointed that you are not emotional and you dislike emotional people in your video
I don't know if you are F type or not. All I know is that you are not ILI,LII, SLI, LSI, LIE. I am going to watch your video later, maybe I could see something useful at that time.
seems IEI
4 experts one thread...
IEI
LSE
ESE
ILE
I may agree with one of them. Not sure yet.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
He’s ESE
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Again, it's she.
And no, I'm not
I’m such a cluts yes she and yes ESE. You’re not subdued enough to be LSE. My husband is the serious LSE
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm not ESE or LSE lol. My Si isn't good enough.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
