worries about anything that could be wrong with your baby and asks others to check her temperature, etc?
worries if you gave them enough food?
asks others to check to see if your baby's temperature is ok?
worries about anything that could be wrong with your baby and asks others to check her temperature, etc?
worries if you gave them enough food?
asks others to check to see if your baby's temperature is ok?
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 04-21-2019 at 10:32 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I didnt get it... you have an asian baby? what happened?
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I forgive you
I think maybe you should mention others here who are mothers for support? This is probably common for new mothers to worry about if you mean yourself.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
btw, Not Type Related. having a baby leads many woman to depression, the burden of caring for such a small creature and provide for them... with all the risks that implies... and "will I be a good mum? am I ready for this? why is this lil thing always crying?! ç__ç" well it's not easy. you know it better than anyone. when we're in altered states, it can be hard to asses a type, as well..
> asks others to check to see if your baby's temperature is ok?
S type would check it himself
Last edited by Ave; 04-23-2019 at 03:06 PM.
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
Someone inexperienced with babies, like first time moms or someone who needs lots of reassurance.
When I am asked to babysit infants I am slightly on edge until the parents come back. I don't want them to perish on my watch. I am always surprised when people trust me with their kids. They know how I am. Maybe it isn't about trusting me and more about them just needing a break.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I admit there have been times I would walk around the house telling people to feel my forehead and tell me if I had a fever. If they said no I thought their hands were just too warm to tell because I was sick or thought I might be.getting sick. My ILI ex bought me my own thermometer so I would leave him alone. He also said something about us being poor judges of temperature or something like that. I think he meant me more than him. In winter I was always cold and he was always hot so we would have a battle of the thermostat. I used to assume if I was cold so was everyone else and if I was hot so were they. Turns out I was wrong.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I got it guys. It’s Ne negative
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
"EII out of his fears that "something might happen" produced by his creative function of "intuition of possibilities" (-Ne)"
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Low S.
SEI's and ESE's notice the clothing stuff and what sorts of effects it has on others' bodies. Same applies to LSE's and SLI's. They are usually sure of stuff.
Se ego pay attention to external aesthetics and may go too clinical with it. Their dual are supposed to be the worst in this aspect as they can be inappropriate. LSE for example might get bit upset when it comes to IEI's self-presentation because it might be too off. Hence IEI's need SLE's to apply lipstick on their lips (even males).
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Well there can only be one answer. It's Fi Ne, since it's what you're experiencing and you're EII. There can be nothing else.
It is Pure Logic.
Also, S-types have built-in thermometers.
And being a T type means automatically believing in whatever obscure crap that you read on the internet.
My aunt and mom did that to me when I was a child. I thought they had a special ability until I learned to drink hot tea from a friend in order to stay home from school and play with her. If I didn't feel hot to the touch they got out the thermometer. Once I didn't want the tea so I just stuck it in boiling hot tea. It broke and then it was just a series of events that were terrible, including a trip to the doctor. I never did it again.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung