ESIs/ISFjs are not inherently more moral.

[The Reality Denialist]

Who says morals are personal? Jung has interesting views of this in his descriptions.


I think that shaking external balance towards own ends would make things unethical. Which indirectly includes lost of Fi base actions. So if you shoot your own foot constantly you should be clear.

[Adam Strange]

Who says morals are personal? Jung has interesting views of this in his descriptions.


I think that shaking external balance towards own ends would make things unethical. Which indirectly includes lost of Fi base actions. So if you shoot your own foot constantly you should be clear.

I've looked for an absolute basis for morality for years and I've never found one, outside of "survival of the species".

You can find times and cultures where it is alternately moral and not moral to:
1. Kill people
2. Eat your relatives.
3. Marry your sister.
4. Lie, cheat, and steal,

The list goes on. To assume that your morality is the correct one is to assume that your culture and time and circumstance are the correct ones.

[The Reality Denialist]

I've looked for an absolute basis for morality for years and I've never found one, outside of "survival of the species".

You can find times and cultures where it is alternately moral and not moral to:
1. Kill people
2. Eat your relatives.
3. Marry your sister.
4. Lie, cheat, and steal,

The list goes on. To assume that your morality is the correct one is to assume that your culture and time and circumstance are the correct ones.

Call this Fe masochistic morals if you do not hurt others and possibly yourself you can be a fool but not a bad person.

Anyways I have heard ESI judgements. I think Ti takes much harder path on individual but less so in communal sense.