Hmm, I always assumed ESI's and really Gammas in general (with the exception of SEE perhaps) were a bit more serious minded than me. I could be leaning too much into stereotype, though. I don't have much experience with Gamma types.
Yes, but I kinda see the Ni being more... Beta quadra? The mysticism and such. Gammas seem to be far more realistic wit their Ni things than I do.You definitely love to get into Ni after you need some extra enjoyment and leisure after immersing enough in Ego stuff (Se). At least based on your questionnaire.
Having a plan and a vision can be very very Ni HA.
.... or could it be how EIE's try hard to flex their Se? Haha, I'm not necessarily refuting you or anything, just self-perception is what it is.Yeah you are willful and forceful enough based on your description to be Se ego, Se creative with strengthened Se expression is fine. I always see xSI-Se's this way, liking to emphasise that extra Se. (Applies to myself too lol)
I've known EIE's who have said the same things as what is underlined, however, when talking about their preferred environments.Te dual seeking:
"Te as suggestive function in ESI (ISFj; Dreiser) and EII (INFj; Dostoyevsky) - this person easily believes in facts and figures, often turn a deaf ear to everything but these. Keeps to places where he knows what to do in every situation. Suggestible by the external order of things, which is often the order that was in place during his upbringing: the political system, social norms, etc. Reacts sensitively to social changes: "God grant you do not live in an era of change." Always moves in the direction of highest order and carefully avoids chaos, is inspired by this order and worries that in future it might change. In this regard, may gravitate towards work in the military, which has the force of statute. It is important to him that the environment is always organized in accordance to rules and laws that he is accustomed to, that this order does not contradict the facts of objective reality. It is also important to know who should be in what position, what needs to be done, what documents must be collected, for what purpose, where they should be submitted, what is the correct way to fill them out. Feels most comfortable in situations where there is only one interpretation of correct action, without any admixture with elements of subjectivity: "in this such case, this should be done". Knowledge of the facts of the situation often replaces true understanding of the underlying problems. Understanding becomes superficial, simply a collection of surface data and statistics, laws and regulations. He does not like long and detailed explanations, will immediately interrupt and say: "So what is this in actuality?". He wants to get a working solution or order right away, not the rationale behind it. For example: "2x2=4." This is an already established rule. Likes terminology, you can sometimes talk to him only using some accepted terms and this will be sufficient. Does not like those who destroy the norms of behavior, for example, those who break the chain of command. Especially gets influenced by the facts that he sees with his own eyes or can touch with own hands. Thus he can fall victim to scams that provide specious claims and facts, especially if the scam is done out in the open ("simple dexterity of hands and no tricks")."
(From here.)
The underlined I've seen in your questionnaire answers and in this post of yours too
Hmmm what do you mean, exactly?You sound very Fi base with this yeah. The principles, do they involve Ni?
Haha, I find most "business" sort of things to be extremely boring as well.I do sometimes wonder how LIE is supposed to get along with ESI lol since ESI stereotypically is so moral. (Re: the capitalism note)
You wanting accuracy seems Te alright to me, you just want good quality Te and you'd rather not deal with it on your own (implying Te DS rather than Te role perhaps).
I guess what I mean by not taking things slow and steady is that I would prefer to do them faster.Funny you say you don't do anything slow and steady, but I would guess you sometimes do, because of how you said in your thehotelambush questionnaire that you need time to adjust to some changes (Ne PoLR).
But btw for myself too, I have the Se stuff way more in foreground than the Si stuff i.e. I like to dive in with energy into many things.
When I am assigned cashier at work, for example, I worry less about perfectly bagging things or something as much as I just want to get the wait line down, and I want to learn things quickly to be able to do it quicker.
There are some things I would take my time on though, I'm sure.