Well, my first reaction is that I resonate with Ne at my root and sacral chakras and how they energetically process information, and Ni at my solar plexus and heart chakras.
I am better at inductive thinking than analytical deductive thinking. I am too naturally creative to professionally take up an IT career despite having some programming experience. I find the narrow focus too unpleasant. It almost hurts. Most of my work experience is a split between thinker and feeler jobs but most of my professional positions have been in perhaps more possibilities oriented thinking roles. Plus mundane calculations. I studied physics mostly driven by interest because it wasn't always necessarily a piece of cake. I enjoyed Calculus II setting up double integrals to calculate the areas and volumes of different geometries by various self-chosen methods. I enjoyed differential equations immensely and was at the top of my class plus one of 2 women in the class. LaplDace transforms were actually a lot of fun. People my age were out having fun by hanging out socializing doing drugs having sex. Well my fun was Laplace transforms. I did only fair in algebra in the low grades because it was so boring to me. I usually had math teachers I didn't personally like then compared to college profs. And I was so bored with algebra I used to avoid homework and just cram 15 minutes before a unit test to get a C. As also mentioned in other threads, I am a highly imaginative person in that I am good at coming up with new ideas. But I get bored reading most mundane fiction, so I bored I can't finish books e.g. like Charles ickens Great Expectations. Too hard to concentrate on such fictitious mediocrity. I like Douglas Adams in short doses because his science fiction humor is zany and hilarious and really contrived.