Where do we draw the line between them being different and the same ? Where do we draw the line between the actual types they describe and the "inflated stereotypes" they make about them ?
I agree that both are describing the fact or reality that people can be categorized into 16 types, but the criteria for these categories is where I think they differ. Also I don't get how descriptions of IEs and functions are comparable, I think I demonstrated them differing in my previous post.