Quote Originally Posted by Raver View Post
The issue has little to do with an upper, middle and lower class existing and mostly to do with the widening gap between the rich and working class/poor and the middle class disappearing. It's natural for society to function to have a class disparity of some sort or we end up in a communist state, which has been proven impractical in the past. As I mentioned in this following post, it's largely about the widening gap between the rich and poor due to rising inflation and salaries not keeping up:

http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...=1#post1315234

Basically, the rich are becoming richer and the poor are becoming poorer because if you do the math, it's pretty clear that salaries are not keeping up with inflation and that has been an on going issue since the 1950s. You can increase minimum wage to help deal with it, but it's just a band-aid solution for the real issue at hand, which is salaries are not keeping up to inflation. Our quality of life has decreased quite visibly and noticeably compared to the 1990s and it's obvious to see why. It's also a trend that has shown no means of slowing down and it is continuing at a steady pace.

In an ample amount of North American cities, renting or purchasing a home is not affordable because of the ludicrously high house prices, then add in the rising cost of bills, food and most items and it's not difficult to see that our quality of life decreasing. That is the main crux of the issue in the end, if our quality of life had remained stable or improved then this wouldn't be an issue, but it's a serious issue and we can't just brush it under the carpet that the poor and working class are envious of the rich when the gap between them is widening and there are numerous statistics that prove this is happening.
http://www.in2013dollars.com/1910-do...010?amount=100

2275% cumulative inflation rate in a 100 year period. That is around 3% inflation rate per year. From 1910 to 2010.

http://www.pewresearch.org/wp-conten...e_adjusted.png

Your second picture practically says salaries increased slightly when we adjust for inflation. Meaning they are keeping up with inflation. How is this an argument in your favour?

http://www.in2013dollars.com/1964-do...18?amount=2.50

Basically income increased 4% per year on average from 1964 to 2018.

https://i.pinimg.com/236x/be/14/36/b...-of-living.jpg

So 60 years ago in 1958, you can buy yourself a house at a third of your salary, where as nowadays that is obviously not the case.
House cost in 1958 is $11,975 according to your sources. Average income: $4,650 per year.

I'm not sure how you did your math but that is not a third of your salary. It's more than double/triple your salary. It's actually insanely similar to the current situation.

Sorry for not replying earlier. I didn't want to involve myself in your conversation with Ave. I like to hear others thoughts even when we disagree. I enjoyed reading your exchange.