Just watched a program about Peterson on Finnish national TV. Who is this man, what does he stand for? etc. It was so evident that the journalist already had decided that he doesn't like Peterson. Things were simplyfied, misunderstood or taken out of context. It's so tiring.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote