I can’t stop being flabbergasted that you “correct” others’ English. It’s just so insane.
https://www.sciencealert.com/people-...cientists-find
I can’t stop being flabbergasted that you “correct” others’ English. It’s just so insane.
https://www.sciencealert.com/people-...cientists-find
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
To assume that I may have the interest to so significant efforts to change that "most" to the smaller part was baseless. Also I've posted enough of examples to explain the general situation with the theme.
The woman in your example was not IEI, for example. You even did not cared to find the assured example, you doubted in her type. You further and the other ones may do here the similar only.
> or go fuck your wife
Among the alternatives, there was useful to make the note above. So you and other people understood better the value of this theme with your approach and had more chance to switch their effort to more correct themes.
You are too touchy to my criticism about your and others inabbility to make the appropriate content of this thread by their examples.
P.S.
Te, especially base Te is doubtful to be your type. Too significant lack of sense in your behavior and too much of inappropriate Fe emotionality.
@golden
people who constantly say inappropriate bs are idiots
in the case above I have pointed on the wrong term usage and do not point constantly on grammar mistakes
Last edited by Sol; 11-15-2018 at 10:35 PM.
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
@golden
Deal with the mess in your head to reduce the nonsense you produce and such to get lesser of opposing, which annoys you.
Above you protected the lie by another lie.
Lol. I will take the mess in my head over the mess your fingers make on your keyboard.
You really don’t know the fine distinctions among various terms in English, and why should you? I don’t expect you to.
It has nothing to do with lies. I am trying to understand why you think you can correct people’s English. Since you aren’t interested in any kind of discussion about that, I will draw my own conclusions.
Going by the dictionary alone, “sex” does refer to a biological distinction. And “gender” has to do with social role. Those are the strict technical meanings, as you know. But people don’t say, “What’s your sex?” for example to someone online. They probably would avoid both terms, “sex” and “gender,” by saying something like, “Are you male or female?” But if they are going to use one in the context of Avalonia’s statement, “gender” sounds more normal.
This is called “usage.” How people use the language as a living, evolving thing every day.
Last edited by golden; 11-16-2018 at 10:48 PM.
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
Lol. "What's your sex?"
@golden I suspect that even if Sol knew better English, he would disagree with the distinction.
I was going to ask him for a Russian to English translation, but this conversation has lead me to believe that I wouldn't get a better translation than the ones Google produces.
Hey, baby, what’s your sex? ... it could be a very 2019 way to talk, we shall see!
I know I’m being a bitch about this, and it’s because I also have been on the receiving end of these “corrections” and it’s just .
@Sol, by the way, I actually respect the fact that you are communicating in English. I can barely read a little bit of Russian and can say only a few words and phrases of it.
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
I tried desperately to think of a fat IEI celebrity to post here, yet failed. The punchline will never be delivered, I am sorry.
no
not high chance we'll match
Susan Boyle
Rule of thumb:
If she is willing to have sexual intercourse with me (or at least implies openness to such a sensitive state of undress...mhmmmmmmm) then she is both Democratic in her assessment of humanity and indifferent to the deep and agonizing need to be true to ones "values". Oh, how difficult that must be...when on the one hand, the man is being accused of sexual assault, but he is a far left ideologue who supports destroying the patriarchy. Michel Avenatti 2.0. I will be enjoying myself immensely over the next few weeks.
Ahh, beyond all doubt, I will bathe in liberal tears for a generation. As will you, my friend, such is your reward for insatiable curiosity. The tide is turning. But, as for now, let us delight in activating the sensual pleasure of certain females beyond human compare. I have a moleskin-rimmed condom designed especially to induce violent orgasms in the receiving party. Dare to dream, for at the end of days, even dreams will become real.
The hydrocortisone (0.1%) is influencing my mind.
mb
Oh my.
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
women are perfect!
almost all...
This thread has given me AIDS
Probably makes more sense to default to Beta STs concerning matters of "thiccness"--at least you'd get to stay in your own quadra.
I mean, I wouldn't be surprised if she's had an injection or two or three, but impressive, nonetheless.
a song "From what are made boys and girls"
it's in the borders of normal weight according to the fat on sides of the abdomen. good curvy figure
while our horned viking demanded thick ones. > 25 BMI
Last edited by Sol; 05-08-2019 at 11:41 AM.
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
if your ex- was similar and you like this one too, then seems you prefer women with rounder shapes
despite my taste, the heart did _serious_ choices often to thinner ones (I suppose that was random). emotions which a woman inspires was the main factor for serious attraction, incuding a passion. while on streets my attention is mostly on curvy ones
in this forum context, I'd note that the ones who seek for duality are more possibly to forget about tastes in people look. with high personal symathy they may become attracted to anyone despite their look, race, IQ, income, etc. and such to get long relations with good passion too. that passion will be supported by soul attraction to "your woman".
also there can be other factors besides Jung types to who we feel "it's my native one"
it can be hard to reject some people even if you'll understand - that another woman has better IR with me and mb other traits not worse.
this will look as irrational heart choice by traits we still don't know about. those other important traits to choose "your woman" may to exist, as I note some dual women inspire lesser of "my native" feelings in me than not-dual ones. mb it's due to past experience with those people, but mb due to their personal traits
there is a lot to study about people attractions and relations still
This thread had such potential but turned ass. Back on track
Antonia Thomas
antonia_thomas_difficile.png
antonia-thomas-1489645315.jpg
https://linktr.ee/tehhnicus
Jesus is King stops black magic and closes portals
self diagnosed ASD, ADHD, schizotypal/affective
Your face makes your brain and sociotype – how muscle use shapes personality
I want to care
if I was better I’d help you
if I was better you’d be better
Human Design 2/4 projector life path 1
It's shocking the lack of humor this thread had. But idk if IEIs are necessarily the thicc ones of the socion. Irrational SFs usually have that stereotype, ESEs at times. ESI usually gets the ballerina figure in descriptions.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
Lol I thought it was quite funny, I was expecting to be offended..But I know what you mean though
At first I thought it meant thicc, as in thick/dumb.
I am more comfortable with my body than I used to be. I don’t like how my body puts on weight- I look fat/unhealthy when I put on a few pounds. Other people seem to pull it off a bit more. My butt and boobs could be better but they’re not the worst and my legs are quite good. I like SEI figures, they look so comfortable in their bodies.
Last edited by Bethanyclaire; 04-20-2022 at 11:09 AM.