Anyone want to help make socionics scientific?

[sbbds]

If there are, then I look forward to the entire professional socionic community coming to a consensus how socionics is best applied, which theories are wrong, and how to settle a difference of opinion when two schools disagree what type someone should be, and putting all of this in a format that can be presented to researchers in american and convince them socionics is a field worth studying.

We all know, lol. Is this something you just became aware of?

How can socionics be falsified without testing the structural correlations?

Refer to my first post in this thread.