Results 1 to 40 of 533

Thread: Anyone want to help make socionics scientific?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Lao Tzunami's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    517
    Mentioned
    72 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sbbds View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ajsindri View Post
    ... fulfilling the criteria of falsifiability, which like it or not, is how we do things in the west. I didn't make the rules, I'm just trying to win the game...
    PS- That’s how we do things here in the east too.

    Sorry in advance for the reality.
    How can socionics be falsified without testing the structural correlations?

  2. #2
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    EII typed by Gulenko
    Posts
    4,654
    Mentioned
    339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ajsindri View Post
    If there are, then I look forward to the entire professional socionic community coming to a consensus how socionics is best applied, which theories are wrong, and how to settle a difference of opinion when two schools disagree what type someone should be, and putting all of this in a format that can be presented to researchers in american and convince them socionics is a field worth studying.
    We all know, lol. Is this something you just became aware of?

    Quote Originally Posted by ajsindri View Post
    How can socionics be falsified without testing the structural correlations?
    Refer to my first post in this thread.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •