Originally Posted by
Lord Pixel
It's the LIE's Ni. It feels like too strong and narrow an assessment of a person. It seems to jump to a conclusion about a person too quickly and the EII's Ne is like "Nooo look at all these other possibilties of why this person can be this or that, you don't know for sure why they are the way they are." EII might defend the person and say "He's just going through a hard time and dealing with past traumas." LIE would jump to the conclusion and say "He's a psychopath." I guess it simply just feels unfair and judgmental to make a call on what a person IS based off one or two traits or incidences when you barely know them. Ni egos tend to make that leap about people very quickly when they first meet them, Ne egos do not like that.
But yea over time with the EII themselves see more and more evidence they will come to their own conclusion, perhaps the LIE just gets there faster while the EII holds out, innocent till proven guilty I guess.
I also recognize my own draw to SLEs, even knowing what they are made of. The feeling tends to override the logic there, and you want to hope it will be better than what you think I guess. But EIIs who don't know socionics might feel like "Oh my god I never felt this way about anyone." and get with an SLE despite knowing they are wrong for them, I think it's a matter of just yielding to that strong feeling.
Not exactly sure why EIIs might shrug off that advice you said, but I do know that some LIE advice tends to encourage one to do hard inconvenient work for long amounts of time lol, probably advice based in Te, Ni and Se, and that can feel inconvenient to an EII. LSE advice tends to sound more convenient like "All you have to do is take this pill once a week.", there advice usually sounds super easy to implement. Also the advice you said sounds like you are super sure the person will get dehydrated, and an EII might think " I did this before and I haven't gotten dehydrated, you don't know fore sure that i will." Like that super sureness (even if you are right and EII learns later on) seems restricting to EII, and they prefer to have a benefit of the doubt, in this case the benefit would be not having to remember to drink water, it's not a big deal but it's simply just easier(but I am also speaking as an EII with e9 in my tritype). LSE might word this more in a way to be prepared, like, drink water so you don't get dehydrated, making dehydration seem more like a possibility and not a promised outcome, like "Do this just in case." That appeals to Ne, to be prepared for a possible outcome, than to worry about the inevitable outcome which seems more Ni based and isn't valued by EII, hence the shrugging the shoulders. Minor difference in wording when saying do this because else X will happen (implying X is what happens 100% of the time, Ne usually resists being 100% sure about most things) vs do this so X doesn't happen( implying X might happen but isn't sure to happen, very Ne based and well received when presented as a possibility) . Ni usually makes me scream 'YOU DON'T KNOW THAT FOR SURE!" Even if the person is inevitably right, I just naturally react that way until I see it for myself. I imagine LSE's just incase approach might not work on an ESI who wants to know what's the mostly likely outcome and less concerned about unlikely possibilities.