Because where do you ever start from otherwise, pulling ideas out of your asshole?
What you are not getting is that just because one looks at observations it doesn't have to mean failing to take into account conditions for the observations, let alone the use of circular logic afterwards. There are many ways to analyse observations and many ways to investigate them in the context of explanations of already existing theories. And Socionics is no different here.
Sure, I know, it means people who read a book from Popper and then follow it word by word.But you don't know what "Popperian" means or stands for.
Jk...
You really think that the process of coming up with a hypothesis in science is strictly regulated? You can do whatever really as long as it results in a sensible hypothesis that's testable and makes sense in light of previous scientific understanding. Yes, you can utilize the evil induction too, you just have to eventually end up at a sensible hypothesis.How did you inductively come up with a hypothesis?