Dimensionality Addendum

[niffer]

So you're saying how you are applying your second proposition is false. Ok

Er.... no? What are you talking about?

[Lao Tzunami]

I'm not talking about valuation, attitudes, etc. here... These thing are all irrelevant to dimensionality in the first place.

What are you talking about then? The dimensions have a clear hierarchy: experience, then norm, then situation, and then 'world/ time'. What can the demonstrative function do that the base cannot?

You are right that the actual dimensions do not have to do with values, but if you differentiate them further, you are in the domain of the four contrasts I posted first: mental-vital, accepting-producing, inert-contact and valued-subdued.

Er.... no? What are you talking about?

If the demonstrative function is not the strongest, and your ranking is the result of your logic, one of your proposition must be false. If you want to support that the vulnerable function is weakest because it is sensitive to being in an environment focused on it, but the suggestive actually enjoys that, then ok, that makes your application of your second axiom false.

[niffer]

What can the demonstrative function do that the base cannot?

A bit more leeway/ability in 'world/time'.

You are right that the actual dimensions do not have to do with values, but if you differentiate them further, you are in the domain of the four contrasts I posted first: mental-vital, accepting-producing, inert-contact and valued-subdued.

And? lol

If the demonstrative function is not the strongest, and your ranking is the result of your logic, one of your proposition must be false.

It is though.

If you want to support that the vulnerable function is weakest because it is sensitive to being in an environment focused on it, but the suggestive actually enjoys that, then ok, that makes your application of your second axiom false.

How?

[Lao Tzunami]

@niffer, I saw your deleted post. Since you're into Jungian psychology, you know what a shadow projection is, right? [~u^] You just don't like losing a debate
/

A bit more leeway/ability in 'world/time'.

Dimensions according to niffer:
8D - a bit more
7D - Time
6D - at least a little bit more
5D - Situation
4D - an itsy bit more
3D - Norms
2D - a significant bit more
1D - Experience

I guess this is why the PC police have to make clunky rules about appropriation

[niffer]

Since you're into Jungian psychology, you know what a shadow projection is, right? [~u^] You just don't like losing a debate
/

2 bad your shadow can't project out answers to all the questions you have yet to respond to ^0^