Please type me before I die from uncertainty

[The Reality Denialist]

Dominant would be initiative taking sub in a group. Creative would break conventions in a group.

If you mostly see youself as wanting order from distance then N would be most likely.

[I tend to look around me and form some sort of picture of people and craft my responses based on what I have seen and try to keep it OK. I am really leaning towards H while I can be random... I must say that I have limits but I would wish that it would happen. In Borisova's portraits there was a note that H tends to give indirect insults ]

[schwiftyrickty]

Dominant would be initiative taking sub in a group. Creative would break conventions in a group.

If you mostly see youself as wanting order from distance then N would be most likely.

[I tend to look around me and form some sort of picture of people and craft my responses based on what I have seen and try to keep it OK. I am really leaning towards H while I can be random... I must say that I have limits but I would wish that it would happen. In Borisova's portraits there was a note that H tends to give indirect insults ]

Dominant would be initiative taking sub in a group. Creative would break conventions in a group.

If you mostly see youself as wanting order from distance then N would be most likely.

[I tend to look around me and form some sort of picture of people and craft my responses based on what I have seen and try to keep it OK. I am really leaning towards H while I can be random... I must say that I have limits but I would wish that it would happen. In Borisova's portraits there was a note that H tends to give indirect insults ]

I could make an argument for me being normalizing. Really Dominant is the only one I couldn't make a case for, at least not at this time in my life. The main issue I have with being a normalizer is that I don't think I could be terminal. I've never finished anything ever. Literally ever. I'm always starting things and leaving them. Plus I live a pretty chaotic lifestyle, but maybe not compared to other IEEs?

And I feel that I do the same thing you do. I keep an eye on the people around me and try to level things out. For example if people are talking shit about someone I always try to come to their defense and give the other side of the story, try to explain their possible reasoning. I don't want things to get too out of hand. Or if I can sense tension between two people I will try to iron it out, maybe come between them to separate them. I act totally different depending who I'm around also. I feel I read the room and provide what is missing.

[The Reality Denialist]

I could make an argument for me being normalizing. Really Dominant is the only one I couldn't make a case for, at least not at this time in my life. The main issue I have with being a normalizer is that I don't think I could be terminal. I've never finished anything ever. Literally ever. I'm always starting things and leaving them. Plus I live a pretty chaotic lifestyle, but maybe not compared to other IEEs?

And I feel that I do the same thing you do. I keep an eye on the people around me and try to level things out. For example if people are talking shit about someone I always try to come to their defense and give the other side of the story, try to explain their possible reasoning. I don't want things to get too out of hand. Or if I can sense tension between two people I will try to iron it out, maybe come between them to separate them. I act totally different depending who I'm around also. I feel I read the room and provide what is missing.

OK non dominant. LOL, I have to do this argument thingy with you. Maybe creative? Creatives might put on some sort of normalizing show. Yes, I have noted noted that one celebrity ILE-C who certainly got very pendantic.

Anyways, do N types try to put you in order? Or do you try to twist N brain?

[schwiftyrickty]

OK non dominant. LOL, I have to do this argument thingy with you. Maybe creative? Creatives might put on some sort of normalizing show. Yes, I have noted noted that one celebrity ILE-C who certainly got very pendantic.

Anyways, do N types try to put you in order? Or do you try to twist N brain?

Is there something about me that seems normalizing to you, or you just don't see harmonizing? I would say the people that know me best would consider me the antithesis of Normalizing. I'm all over the place. The only thing normalizing about me is how meticulous I am with laundry and my love of making lists and spreadsheets. And my current educational/long term career path would be well suited to a normalizer (paralegal), but that's kind of why I'm rethinking it. I don't think I'm personally suited to that sort of work. I just wanted an excuse to own lots of fancy watches and wear all my loafers and dress socks somewhere lol.I honestly don't know WHAT kind of work I'm suited for. I wouldn't want to be involved in something strictly creative either because I'm not enough of a self-starter. I give up too easily. I don't want to be supervised but I kind of need to be. The older I get the more I feel I'm destined for a life of mediocrity. I like my stupid job. I just need more money to pay off all my debt. The sheriff is apparently looking for me because I haven't been paying off my credit cards for like 5 years.

Really I want to write novels and/or go into stand-up comedy. But I'm too easily distracted. I work on these projects on and off, quickly losing interest when I hit rough spots.

I would definitely say N types try to put me in order. But it's hopeless. As soon as I'm alone I do what I please. I don't think I'm too put-off by normalizing tendencies though. I might find it cute. They're probably more put-off by me. Because you see I don't care. Normalizing types care. Very few things are important to me. Ideas and people, that's all that matters. Things aren't real to me.

Functionally, normalizing or harmonizing makes the most sense. I don't think I have the enhanced Se that creatives are supposed to have. I have zero willpower.

[The Reality Denialist]

Is there something about me that seems normalizing to you, or you just don't see harmonizing? I would say the people that know me best would consider me the antithesis of Normalizing. I'm all over the place. The only thing normalizing about me is how meticulous I am with laundry and my love of making lists and spreadsheets. And my current educational/long term career path would be well suited to a normalizer (paralegal), but that's kind of why I'm rethinking it. I don't think I'm personally suited to that sort of work. I just wanted an excuse to own lots of fancy watches and wear all my loafers and dress socks somewhere lol.I honestly don't know WHAT kind of work I'm suited for. I wouldn't want to be involved in something strictly creative either because I'm not enough of a self-starter. I give up too easily. I don't want to be supervised but I kind of need to be. The older I get the more I feel I'm destined for a life of mediocrity. I like my stupid job. I just need more money to pay off all my debt. The sheriff is apparently looking for me because I haven't been paying off my credit cards for like 5 years.

Really I want to write novels and/or go into stand-up comedy. But I'm too easily distracted. I work on these projects on and off, quickly losing interest when I hit rough spots.

I would definitely say N types try to put me in order. But it's hopeless. As soon as I'm alone I do what I please. I don't think I'm too put-off by normalizing tendencies though. I might find it cute. They're probably more put-off by me. Because you see I don't care. Normalizing types care. Very few things are important to me. Ideas and people, that's all that matters. Things aren't real to me.

Functionally, normalizing or harmonizing makes the most sense. I don't think I have the enhanced Se that creatives are supposed to have. I have zero willpower.

Nah. Do not at IE's when it comes to DCNH. I suggested Creative as creatives have drive to put their thoughts into established form hence their all over the place behavior becomes normalizing at times.

[schwiftyrickty]

Nah. Do not at IE's when it comes to DCNH. I suggested Creative as creatives have drive to put their thoughts into established form hence their all over the place behavior becomes normalizing at times.

You think the strengthened IEs thing is bullshit and look at DCNH as its own independent system? Do you also think it is wrong to compare yourself to other people of your type when deciding DCNH? Like to say "compared to most IEEs I may seem normalizing, but even compared to a creative LSI I will seem C."?

[schwiftyrickty]

If simply looking at creatives like this: "creatives have drive to put their thoughts into established form ", then yes. I'm 100% creative. But I would think most IEEs would have that drive. How would you summarize harmonizing and normalizing types?