Your typing of forum members

[Squirrel]

What do you guys think my type is? One thing I'm absolutely sure of is that I'm an emotivist and the second thing I'm mostly sure of is that I'm an introtim. What cognitive style do my posts most clearly reflect?

I haven't observe your behaviors here but ILIs are not emotovists

[SacredKnowing]

I haven't observe your behaviors here but ILIs are not emotovists

Try to type without using the profile TIM as a guide.

[nifl]

What do you guys think my type is? One thing I'm absolutely sure of is that I'm an emotivist and the second thing I'm mostly sure of is that I'm an introtim. What cognitive style do my posts most clearly reflect?

make a typing video

[Squirrel]

Try to type without using the profile TIM as a guide.

I still don`t have an answer except wishing you good luck

[welcometomania]

gives me an impression of your possible semi-dual, IEE

I disagree with you (on me being SEI), but thank you for the effort, though

[seeking it]

@one If you don't mind being typed my guess for you is ESI

[seeking it]

yES!! closer to EIEs
Can you switch it up a little so I can get typed LSI for the second time by someone else aside from n9

Btw I don’t really mind. Can you explain why though or did you type by vibes

Sorry no luck with this one, not LSI imo

I though of ESI because your posts seem to be like they include concrete descriptions and yet there is an a deep intuitive associations vibe and I associate that with ESIs, that manner of reflecting on things. If that makes sense.

[SacredKnowing]

Typing works like Jewish dream interpretation: it highly depends on the intention of the one typing you. I discovered the intention of the man who typed me ILI-N and I reject it.

[on a peaceful hiatus]

@pasleine - IEI

[Metamorph]

@Alive - IEI

[nifl]

@Alive - IEI

most possibly

[on a peaceful hiatus]

most possibly

We can have a skype conversation if you want to. Talk about the stuff we know. I'm definitely not an ethical type. I understand the theory well enough to know what fits and what doesn't.

[Squirrel]

@Alive , seriously and away from any " typing battle " or anything like that

How does your Ne manifest usually ?

[on a peaceful hiatus]

Interest in almost anything without ever thinking about material benefits. Jumping from topic to topic. The ability to give up beliefs or pursuits on a whim. Grasping the general idea of how something works quickly (focusing on the broad, most important points instead of going through the details in-depth, which is Ni).

[Squirrel]

Okay but what about @Alive being EII instead of LII ?

LII is the last thing I think of as his type

[on a peaceful hiatus]

Okay but what about @Alive being EII instead of LII ?

LII is the last thing I think of as his type

I'm not an ethical person, but I would be open about recording a discussion with someone like @Aster if she wants to so you people have some footage on an LII

[nifl]

Okay but what about @Alive being EII instead of LII ?

LII is the last thing I think of as his type

too crass for Fi, when Fi egos get annoyed they don't talk like he does with Coeruleum.

Jumping from topic to topic. The ability to give up beliefs or pursuits on a whim.

what he describes about himself here is closer to irrationality than Ne ego. and his aversion to popularity or being well-known - introversion, not logic. he's not LII for sure - his thinking is not rational. and his views of people and their abilities is not nuanced, which is less likely for Ne egos. however, his mind seems more complex and far-reaching, his style is not simplistic, so on that basis sensory is also less likely. he has a flair for humour and irony - closer to Fe emotional agitation and the mental complexity of intuitives. another point for intuition is his reasonably good abilities in VI from my perspective, even though he uses subtypes and probably does not see types on the same basis as I do. I'm sometimes impressed by how he hits a mark close to what I see too. sensors, especially Se types, have worse perceptions of the characters of people.

from the video introversion and intuition, more irrational was also apparent. but he's ethical and irrational, not logical. compare his way of talking with mine, yours and Clarke's.

what's your opinion on Snowgirl's and my type, @Alive? be interesting to hear your view

[Squirrel]

I'm not an ethical person, but I would be open about recording a discussion with someone like @Aster if she wants to so you people have some footage on an LII

Do you have any reasons other than not caring about other people ?

I thought of you being EII with 1L + 3/4 E in psyche yoga (this is very very possible with you honestly , it would make you look like a logical type, but it doesn't mean you're a logical type )

I know a lot of LIIs , and they are all clearly strong in logic and provide very convincing evidence in the conversation , no offense to you but your logic and way of analyzing things in general is so much weaker than them that I exclude LII completely

[on a peaceful hiatus]

I don't have an answer that is all that interesting nifl. I think both you and Snowgirl are IEI, and sol is likely one too. I'm convinced that there aren't all that many types in the west that would actively engage in something like socionics

[Squirrel]

too crass for Fi, when Fi egos get annoyed they don't talk like he does with Coeruleum.

what he describes about himself here is closer to irrationality than Ne ego. and his aversion to popularity or being well-known - introversion, not logic. he's not LII for sure - his thinking is not rational. and his views of people and their abilities is not nuanced, which is less likely for Ne egos. however, his mind seems more complex and far-reaching, his style is not simplistic, so on that basis sensory is also less likely. he has a flair for humour and irony - closer to Fe emotional agitation and the mental complexity of intuitives. another point for intuition is his reasonably good abilities in VI from my perspective, even though he uses subtypes and probably does not see types on the same basis as I do. I'm sometimes impressed by how he hits a mark close to what I see too. sensors, especially Se types, have worse perceptions of the characters of people.

from the video introversion and intuition, more irrational was also apparent. but he's ethical and irrational, not logical. compare his way of talking with mine, yours and Clarke's.

what's your opinion on Snowgirl's and my type, @Alive? be interesting to hear your view

Honestly, I don't have a strong opinion about your type because you don't participate in anything impersonal in this forum to know how your life works, but what I noticed is a clear dependence on Ti compared to Te (you have your own theories that you follow)

Definitely not LSI , LSI appear Te-ish when dealing with theories due to low unvalued Ne

SLI , LII , ILI what I'll think of

[Squirrel]

Snowgirl are IEI

Do you have reasons?
away from Ni+ because I'm 10000% not a future oriented person ( I even have anxiety and uncertainty about the future and the unknown in general )

[nifl]

@Snowgirl

what I noticed is a clear dependence on Ti compared to Te (you have your own theories that you follow)

I generally follow *most* of the basic theory without much elaboration (Ti scepticism - although Ne valuers more like new and interesting ideas in general), think about and try to apply what others have written about it, and my own observations and experiences (Te)
more Ti-enthusiastic posters here are Rusal, for example. enjoys and utilizes (in my opinion excessive and nonsensical) elaborations on the theory. IEI may be right for her.

I'd like to be an intuitive, honestly, but I don't have the expansive or creative mind that usually characterises those people. I realised this when I had to decide between ILI and SLI, through self-reflection about dichotomies and values, comparison with others and most importantly intertype relations.

[Squirrel]

@Snowgirl

I generally follow *most* of the basic theory without much elaboration (Ti scepticism - although Ne valuers more like new and interesting ideas in general), think about and try to apply what others have written about it, and my own observations and experiences (Te)
more Ti-enthusiastic posters here are Rusal, for example. enjoys and utilizes (in my opinion excessive and nonsensical) elaborations on the theory. IEI may be right for her.

I'd like to be an intuitive, honestly, but I don't have the expansive or creative mind that usually characterises those people. I realised this when I had to decide between ILI and SLI, through self-reflection about dichotomies and values, comparison with others and most importantly intertype relations.

I don't see anything that contrasts with you being SLI honestly

[on a peaceful hiatus]

Do you have reasons?
away from Ni+ because I'm 10000% not a future oriented person ( I even have anxiety and uncertainty about the future and the unknown in general )

I don't really have any logical explanation why I type you this way, it's intuition that points in that direction. fear of the future is associated with Ni

Such an individual perceives information from without as feelings about the future, past, and present. For example, a sense of hurriedness, calmness, or heatedness, a sense of timeliness or prematureness, a sense of proper or improper life rhythm, a sense of impending danger or safety, anticipation, fear of being late, a sense of seeing the future, anxiety about what lies ahead, and so forth.

https://www.wikisocion.net/en/index....rted_intuition

too crass for Fi, when Fi egos get annoyed they don't talk like he does with Coeruleum.

my reactions are quite strong true, although I need to mention that the constant lies about what I'm claiming are quite difficult for me to ignore as a logical type, as I define myself through the things I research. when someone casually claims things that I never said, that gets annoying. I could ignore it if it happens one or two times, but it happened dozens of times. it was only a matter of time until it was bound to escalate.

[Squirrel]

Such an individual perceives information from without as feelings about the future, past, and present. For example, a sense of hurriedness, calmness, or heatedness, a sense of timeliness or prematureness, a sense of proper or improper life rhythm, a sense of impending danger or safety, anticipation, fear of being late, a sense of seeing the future, anxiety about what lies ahead, and so forth.

Except for feeling like I'm going to be late for something , and worrying that something will go wrong, I don't relate to the rest

I rarely think about the flow of time or such things , most of my time is spent in perceiving what I see/hear/smell , and in observing changes in my environment + reacting directly to them when needed.

What I'm saying wasn't clear to me at first, I realized this after a very long time of observing myself

Thank you for explaining anyway

[Squirrel]

btw, I'm between two types now (after a discussion with a LII-Ti friend of mine , we narrowed my type down to two), so any further discussions wouldn't really make a difference, but I'm just asking out of curiosity

[nifl]

@PrelapsarianAdam is more like an ethical type

[seeking it]

@Snowgirl

I generally follow *most* of the basic theory without much elaboration (Ti scepticism - although Ne valuers more like new and interesting ideas in general), think about and try to apply what others have written about it, and my own observations and experiences (Te)
more Ti-enthusiastic posters here are Rusal, for example. enjoys and utilizes (in my opinion excessive and nonsensical) elaborations on the theory. IEI may be right for her.

I'd like to be an intuitive, honestly, but I don't have the expansive or creative mind that usually characterises those people. I realised this when I had to decide between ILI and SLI, through self-reflection about dichotomies and values, comparison with others and most importantly intertype relations.

You seem LSI

[seeking it]

@Alive - IEI

I've yet to see the Fe

[nifl]

I've yet to see the Fe

https://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/showthread.php/9449-Socionics-Beta-types-Examples?p=1545114&viewfull=1#post1545114

[seeking it]

https://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/showthread.php/9449-Socionics-Beta-types-Examples?p=1545114&viewfull=1#post1545114

Not particularly IEI's Fe

(That is, could be any other type really from Fe valuing types. I've seen Gammas do this too as some form of sarcasm)

[nifl]

Not particularly IEI's Fe

(That is, could be any other type really from Fe valuing types. I've seen Gammas do this too as some form of sarcasm)

there's no difference between Fe's in the Fe egos
Gammas are less likely to mock like this. their sarcasm is usually more passive-aggressive

[seeking it]

there's no difference between Fe's in the Fe egos
Gammas are less likely to mock like this. their sarcasm is usually more passive-aggressive

Fe valuing does not equal Fe ego

[SacredKnowing]

@PrelapsarianAdam is more like an ethical type

Hmm... interesting. Why do you think that?

[nifl]

Hmm... interesting. Why do you think that?

you joke around a lot, play games, are more emotional - your thread about ranking the NTs, for example
you could try to make a typing video for opinions from the forum

[nifl]

Fe valuing does not equal Fe ego

he's not a Ti type

[seeking it]

he's not a Ti type

Oh certainly, he may be an ILI, which isn't a Ti type. @Alive

[seeking it]

you joke around a lot, play games, are more emotional - your thread about ranking the NTs, for example
you could try to make a typing video for opinions from the forum

Man, you don't need to be an Ethical type to be able to joke around a lot or show any emotion at all.

[nifl]

Man, you don't need to be an Ethical type to be able to joke around a lot or show any emotion at all.

never said that, but the more it is done, the more likely for the person to be ethical. he showed trouble with understanding the basic theory, too. him being ILE is doubtful on that basis, doubtful enough to seriously consider his type again
you misrepresent what i said in the very previous message and have trouble with logical nuance, it seems. ethical is also possible for you.

Alive is most likely IEI, which is close to your suggestion. he thinks too simplistically and illogically for ILI - his claim about sensors being focused on material reality all the time is a simplification that's unlikely for any logical type to make, especially a Te type which is focused on practice more than theory. also he's less boring than the typical logical type IME

[seeking it]

never said that, but the more it is done, the more likely for the person to be ethical. he showed trouble with understanding the basic theory, too. him being ILE is doubtful on that basis, doubtful enough to seriously consider his type again
you misrepresent what i said in the very previous message and have trouble with logical nuance, it seems. ethical is also possible for you.

Alive is most likely IEI, which is close to your suggestion. he thinks too simplistically and illogically for ILI - his claim about sensors being focused on material reality all the time is a simplification that's unlikely for any logical type to make, especially a Te type which is focused on practice more than theory. also he's less boring than the typical logical type IME

I haven't read a lot from @PrelapsarianAdam but he seems to have a very sophisticated understanding of theory. Too theoretical for me tbh. Anyways, I have no problem with his self-typing.

@Alive does seem to think in a really simplistic way directly equating too many things with IEs. But that isn't purely type related.

I've found Logical types interesting, it all depends on personality (the personality outside the "type box"), style, intelligence, the content of their thoughts, their achievements, etc.

I'm leaving this comment as last: Ahahah, me being Ethical. Thanks for the compliment though!! I've certainly worked enough on my feelings and my understanding of emotions in general. Mind saying which Ethical I'd be? You (and anyone else) can also post about that in my typing thread here: https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...e-(seeking-it)

Anyhow, I was not misinterpreting your post as written, if you use a statistical approach, it's best to mention that for your posting like this to keep your input unambiguous. Because without mentioning that, it will just come off exactly like I read it, simplistic...which is what I was responding to.