-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
you're all sei
riddikulus finito constituo, fingers crossed no returns
Ave Maria, gratia plena...
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'd get laughed at bigtime if I told someone Im an LSE
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I argue with people all the time about democratic values. So many Americans, many conservative and Republican are aristocratic and anti-equality. I ask them to provide evidence of their individual or their idol's "superiority" and they just say "just look at people, you can tell they aren't the same". No shit. They are missing the point. They don't understand that there isn't an objective measurement of one's overall superiority, only one in context. No human is superior in all things. Even the most intelligent person will suck at many, many things. You can say they are superior in intelligence, or leading, but who cares, someone else is superior at killing enemies, creating art, discovering a cure to a particular disease. What determines illusion of superiority? Feelings, subjective opinion, culture, etc. We are all just a collection of molecules trying to survive, reproduce, etc. We all evolved from the same cell and share the same common ancestor with a chimpanzee. We will all die and humanity will eventually go extinct. Yet, people go around speaking of superiority and making laws and institutions just to protect their sense of special treatment and entitlement.
They laugh at us, but it is an uncomfortable laugh.
I did troll, got told I am on drugs
Because the LSE description is not me, I'm a dreamy guy tha tgets pushed over and is not really visible in space. I'm pretty vague in my statements unless I feel the need to clarify and convince. Me working hard and telling people what to do is a meme in their eyes.
I agree that C is relatively rare in the general population, but I think Cs are more common in a socionics forum. I have suggested N for Troll, but I think C also works (have you seen his video?). Ooo could be H, I don't really know.
Vessy seemed C in her video. Have you seen it?
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Who is Vessy? I haven't seen any videos.
In any case, video might be relevant, but it might be not. I think what the person actually does is more important. A person might seem very goofy on video and you could say "hey this person is Ne to the max, hence C", and that would not be true necessarily.
Have you seen this: https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...108-DCNH-Chart ?
Vesstheastralsilky. She used to be very active, but now she is gone. She had a long video, but it might be gone also.
Of course one can pretend all sorts of things, but video is usually best when (sub)typing imo.In any case, video might be relevant, but it might be not. I think what the person actually does is more important. A person might seem very goofy on video and you could say "hey this person is Ne to the max, hence C", and that would not be true necessarily.
Yes, I've seen it but I didn't understand why N is similar to Dual. I haven't noticed that. Many Normalizers have a hint of Super-Ego type imo. So ESI seems slightly LII and SEI seems slightly ILI, LII seems slightly ESI etc.Have you seen this: https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...108-DCNH-Chart ?
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Nah, I think real D's look all callous, C's look off the place, N's seems too drugged for conformity and H's seem spacey.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
Every ILI is an evil anime mastermind.
A Death Note for the ILIs out there, please .
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
So you are pushy and in the negativist dichotomy
LSE is not going to be changed. You may feel yourself another type but I see Fi seeking (needing validation), someone who can read long term potential of actions that will plan with you which route to pursue in life.
LSE daydream more than they work lol
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Pushy, not much, Ill ask things once and then It's over. I can get behind Fi seeking but I have no need for others giving me long term potential of actions that will plan with me which route to pursue in my life. I would go for someone to act instead of plan or get ideas, because I have plenty but I don't act on them.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html