@Hekate
mb extravert
with videointerview can be checked
@Hekate
mb extravert
with videointerview can be checked
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
@Nocturne
IR test is there. It may show clearly why your correct type and Socionics matter.
The test can be updated later by new examples and such to work a little better. When you know the types of the groups it may work worse as needs from you to be more honest with yourself, but can be used anyway.
nothing to add about your "thinking"
@Chae
seems in typology crysis again as has removed the type from the profile
which one will be there next?
mb she'll create a theme for her type with the voting. or an auction which money will go to [she'll offer better than me]
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
"A wise old owl lived in an oak
The more he saw the less he spoke
The less he spoke the more he heard.
Why can't we all be like that wise old bird?"
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Some animals are more equal than others. One can VI perfect.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
My typing list:
You are either a SEE husband-stealer, or a SEI husband-stealer.
I name you, demons!
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Here's my typing thread, if you need it Beautiful Sky http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...p/56626-Typing
"I would rather be ashes than dust"
"Ultimately, man should not ask what the meaning of his life is, but rather he must recognize that it is he who is asked."
I’m a hundred percent certain on EII-Fi for HotelAmbush. I’ve proven it in the past so it’s kind of old now, but look no further than the cognition that Hotelambush uses to size up people’s types as evidenced by his questionnaire. It’s clear from the questions that he overemphasizes the inner emotional and spiritual life when it comes his evaluation and understanding of other's people's socionics type, including but not limited to stuff like personal values, political/religious beliefs, aspirations, and all that unessential junk, as follows:
What do you study or do for a living? How did you come to do that? What do you like or dislike about it?
What are your values, and why?
What else do you do on a daily basis? What are your interests and hobbies? Why do you do them?
Describe your relations with family and friends. What do you like and dislike about them?
What do you look for in friends? In romantic relationships?
What conflicts have you encountered recently with other people? Why did they happen? Which kinds seem to happen on a regular basis?
How would your friends describe you?
What do people generally see as your strengths? What do you like about yourself?
What are your weaknesses? What criticism do you often face from others? What do you dislike about yourself?
In what areas of life can you manage well on your own? In what areas of your life would you like help?
What things do you find to be a chore? What things do you enjoy more than others?
What goals, aspirations, or plans do you have for the future? How did you come to have them?
If you had enough money to live comfortably for the rest of your life without working, what would you do with your time?
What kinds of things do you do to manage and/or beautify your environment (your room, your house, etc.)? What do you think of daily chores?
How do you behave around strangers?
How do you react to conflict? What do you do if somebody insults or attacks you?
What is one common misconception that people have? Explain why it is wrong.
What did you do last Friday?
Who do you admire, and why?
What are your religious or spiritual beliefs and why do you hold them?
What are your political beliefs, and why? To what extent do you care about politics?
What kind of work environment do you prefer? What do you look for in a job?
What is or was your favorite school subject and why?
How do you approach responsibility? What do you tend to expect of others?
If you were to raise a child, what would be your main concerns, what measures would you take, and why?
What is the purpose of life? What do you find personally meaningful in life?
That’s textbook Fi-dom cognition and the type of questions that EIIs use to build an internal mirror of other's people's inner world. It's the total opposite of Ti-dom. “Fi-dom overemphasizes the inner mental, emotional, spiritual inner life when it comes their evaluation and understanding of other's people's behavior. Thus, Fi devalues/underemphasizes the objective properties in other people and strongly cognizes subjective properties...Ti devalues/underemphasizes the subjective properties in other people and strongly cognizes objective properties.”
More on Fi vs. Ti here: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...09#post1325909
The guy is not an LII. Zero chance.
@Beautiful sky still haven't decided if I'm ESE? I'm disappointed.
This is actually kind of flattering. What would an LII questionnaire look like? Or would they prefer not to use one?
A LII would never come up with such an Fi-centric questionnaire. Sorry. HotelAmbush is Fi-lead, and not to mention a hack when it comes to defining functions but had the gaul to bash Jung last year.
I've also revised my typing of Number9Large to 6w5 sp/sx SEE-Se based on his video below. I initially typed Number6w5Large SEE-Se 6w5 so/sp, so it's not much of a revision. Obviously he is not SLE...His answers indicate a good deal of cognitive reception too hotelambush's questions such that I can take SLE off the table. Hotelambush's questionnaire is only good for sizing up people's Fi, so these questions hit SLE in their PoLR, thus bringing out answers that have a qualia of go fuck yourself. Number9large's responses indicate that Fi is in his ego block, so SEE > SLE. Also apparent is that he is not a 7w8 and not a sx/sp...take a look, there's no toughness there and obviously not a sx/so 8w7 as his previous mistyping. SEE-Se is 7ish so that accounts for his mistaken self-perception, and LSI mistyping of him just results from his enneagram type.
[QUOTE=Number 9 large;1232386]
Last edited by Kill4Me; 03-22-2019 at 03:13 PM.
LII role Fi and this can come across looking like EII; that is a common mistake made for their types
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
----- FarDraft, 2020
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I think I'm sticking with LSI Dominant for Number9
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
New Additions: Karatos, Coeruleum, Niko, Tpaduan, Vesstheastralsilky, Kingslayer, dangerbird89, plasmatorpedo1043, QueenTiger, Lord Pixel, Hamouchou
ILE-Ti: Myst, Transkar, LuchoisLurking, JWC3, MadCity, Troll NR 007, Falsehope
ILE-Ne: Geneiouws, Lagerdemon, Cubazoan, Nickelslick, Hitta, dangerbird89
ESE-Fe: Chipsnunderwear, Suz, Inumbra, Subteigh, Kalinoche, FlutteringShyx, Mrrrmaid
ESE-Si: Mu4, Wacey, Xerx, Esaman, KrigtheViking, Hacim, Little Timmy
LII-Ti: N0ki/Zap, Muddy, Reactance, User Name, Bertrand
LII-Ne: Kimuchi/kimu, Zero, Vers, Vesstheastralsilky
SEI-Si: johannesbloem, chriscorey, the whole English
SEI-Fe: BnD, crazedrat, dinky, Neokortex, Pallas Athena, Coeruleum
SLE-Se: herzy, mercutio, ananke, idontgiveaf
SLE-Ti: agee, kill4me
LSI-Se: Spider, Missbabydoll, Pole, Aramas, Karatos
LSI-Ti: Rocky, Hamouchou
IEI-Fe: Allie, Pink, SisofNight, Cassandra, Fay, Summer Princess, Xiavay
IEI-Ni: Starfall/Fox, Glam, Elina, Strrrng, Velvet, Penny Dreadful
EIE-Fe: Cuivienen
EIE-Ni: Gilly, Darya, Bain, Sarinana
SEE-Se: Woofwoofl, Handjob, Number9Large
SEE-Fi: Lucas, Aquagraph, Chae, Vogue Paris, Totalize, Schwiftyrickity, Niko
LIE-Ni: Ineffable, Moonraker, Avebury
LIE-Te: Ashton, FDG, Expat, Invisiblehim, Narc, Anglas
ESI-Se: DiscoJoe, EJArendee, Jet City Woman, MisterNi, Scarletluxx, Amber/Rosewood, Strangeling
ESI-Fi: Lungs, Golden, Ouronis, Radio, Suedehead, Galen, Kore/Persephone, Delilah, the Locust, Saiorse, Hag
ILI-Ni: Scapegrace, Korpsey, Krieger, Cpig, InvisibleJim
ILI-Te: Marie, Mensupermateriam, Aestrivex, Crispy, Soupman
SLI-Si: Words, Stray, Scarper, LuminousLynx, Lord Pixel
SLI-Te: kim, daft punk, directorabbie, pookie, Jessica, may, supremacist, plasmatorpedo1043
LSE-Te: Absurd, JimBean, QueenTiger
LSE-Si: William, JackOliverAaron/Echidna1000, BurningIce, Timmy, Smilingeyes, Laurie’s Crusader, Viktor, Kingslayer
IEE-Ne: Elizathomason, UDP, Sapphire, Syrup De Gem, Pinoline, Azbestos, Nanashi
IEE-Fi: Finale, Airman/airborne, Adam Strange, Prince Andrei, Niffer, Eos
EII-Ne: Aylen, Epheme, Wasp, Tpaduan
EII-Fi: maritsa/beautiful sky, mikemex, IBTL, contra, sol, suintal/silke, tela/arachne, Olimpia, thehotelambush, Yaaroslav
Last edited by Kill4Me; 03-26-2019 at 05:40 PM.
[QUOTE=Kill4Me;1326782]A LII would never come up with such an Fi-centric questionnaire. Sorry. HotelAmbush is Fi-lead, and not to mention a hack when it comes to defining functions but had the gaul to bash Jung last year.
I've also revised my typing of Number9Large to 6w5 sp/sx SEE-Se based on his video below. I initially typed Number6w5Large SEE-Se 6w5 so/sp, so it's not much of a revision. Obviously he is not SLE...His answers indicate a good deal of cognitive reception too hotelambush's questions such that I can take SLE off the table. Hotelambush's questionnaire is only good for sizing up people's Fi, so these questions hit SLE in their PoLR, thus bringing out answers that have a qualia of go fuck yourself. Number9large's responses indicate that Fi is in his ego block, so SEE > SLE. Also apparent is that he is not a 7w8 and not a sx/sp...take a look, there's no toughness there and obviously not a sx/so 8w7 as his previous mistyping. SEE-Se is 7ish so that accounts for his mistaken self-perception, and LSI mistyping of him just results from his enneagram type.
Its funny that u type a Ti polr type as head type in enneagram. Proves u got no brain urself
My girl will have a steak dinner waiting for me in precisely an hour and a half...as I like. I've got a big weekend planned. I'll be back this Monday or so.
Don't be lazy, add your typings to the spreadsheet so your ability to build internal mirror of other people's inner world does not get buried in this thread. Unless you are afraid to have them easily accessible. How you type others reveals a lot about you.
This is what you do with when you evaluate someone's questionnaire.
You are one of the least objective here. I put you in the same category of a few others who stand out. It is all about how you feel about people, even trying to emphasize the fact that you think @thehotelambush is your conflictor more than once. Hate to break it to you but that is all about your subjective feelings toward him. You are intellectually and emotionally dishonest, even with yourself.That’s textbook Fi-dom cognition and the type of questions that EIIs use to build an internal mirror of other's people's inner world. It's the total opposite of Ti-dom. “Fi-dom overemphasizes the inner mental, emotional, spiritual inner life when it comes their evaluation and understanding of other's people's behavior. Thus, Fi devalues/underemphasizes the objective properties in other people and strongly cognizes subjective properties...Ti devalues/underemphasizes the subjective properties in other people and strongly cognizes objective properties.”
You are also gate keeping SLE which is not very SLE-like. Actually not much about you is very SLE. Your imagination runs wild (I know this from my past experiences with you) and your overemphasizes on strength makes you look like you scoured SLE profiles to make yourself look more like one. You are a caricature of SLE. I knew it the first time I read your posts years ago. You continue to confirm this.
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...gs-Spreadsheet
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung