Brave man.
Truthfully, it’s hard to see you guys together. You like Introverts, and @Chae is anything but introverted.
She also seems very diplomatic, while you are less so.
Just hard to see it.
That would be like a sporting recreation, instead of mountain skiing. To improve my fighting skills and reactions. There would be also intellectual - rhetorical training part. We'd got bright and useful impressions from such vacation, I'm sure. In case we'd need a rest, pills would made her more introverted for a while.
> She also seems very diplomatic, while you are less so.
I suspect the physical abbility to touch me by other means would influence on her tactics.
Sure I do pay attention to the colors and composition. I have studied image analysis at university for too long If it comes across as heavy or not is in the eyes of the beholder, I just like bright and moving things - that's a preference and choice. IEE still has no to speak of so I would not expect calming things from this type. They merely appreciate when someone else has that for them. Yes they are South Korean singers/dancers/etc, though some of the groups have Chinese or Thai members, it's not so clear-cut. Jackson Wang here for instance is from Hong Kong and I had him as my avatar.
I lOve wAtEr
And not only "dudes" (what an ugly word) - girls, too. Pay more attention to my gayness
Not Se lead, but Se role, but also EIE? Make up your miiiind. What I question is: where's the ? I don't meet many criteria for the element. Like I don't plan or look ahead for more than an hour And my interest in Aylenesque esoterics only comes from the fact that it looks good and makes decent sense to me. Aesthetic back and forth. Obviously, I'm a 3, surface counts, and I'll make sure you won't overlook me. Make what you want out of that. I take every typing that has "vibes" in it with a grain of salt anyways you know what I'm saying
Last edited by Chae; 03-13-2018 at 01:26 PM.
Well yeah for real, glad it resonates The point is: How can you type a person's atmosphere if that is meant by vibes - I don't know Please tell me. Do you just pick the molecules out of their surroundings and see what they got formed into, shaped or what An impression or characterization should be tangible and accurate, and with evidence at hand. If someone gives concrete examples of text with perhaps a synthesis and says, ah this is [Element XYZ] valued in your speech/opinions/taste/et cetera then we're talking. Anything else rather sounds like one big projection since your own type dictates perception already. How someone types is rather indicative of, obviously: just their type and nothing more.
Oh, no no. It's true, silly. For instance, I am bearing my teenage years, enneagram 4 and don't do volunteer work (just yet) which makes me IEI. I'm also a Gemini on the cusp of Cancer, which as we all know makes for a great Beta NF.
Cholerico-sanguinic temperament as well, by the way.
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
If you identify yourself with sanguinic-choleric temperament and IEI, then you are most likely the Fe-subtype. The Ni-subtype is very unlikely sanguinic or choleric.
I don't identify myself with any. What i've said so far was pure shitposting. I think the four temperaments system is pretty silly, but it's similar to buzzfeed quizzes: Nice to have around when you'd like something to bash and/or identify with for the fun of it.
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
Why do you think that? If anything wouldn't it be the demonstrative function and not a weak function that is more apparent considering it plays a big part in the person's worldview? This idea that HA is clearly visible to the casual observer appears to be a MBTI concept > socionics. What you are saying reminds me of the article I posted on discord about loops.
http://introspective-to-a-fault.blog...niti-loop.html
^ Se described this way could apply to several types out of context. I am not even challenging your typing of Chae since typing is very subjective. I am just wondering what the rational behind the part in bold actually is. Why would creative be bypassed?Se as Mobilizing Function
The individual tends to feel capable of achieving his goals, but hesitates on whether the path he is choosing is the right one. In these cases he needs to feel the support of others in order to be motivated to finally choose. He likes to be involved in competitive and challenging endeavors and to see his will and personal power develop as he overcomes obstacles together with other people. However, he depends on others to provide the gusto and motivation for these endeavors.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
@niffer - mb IEI
@niffer ESI confirmed.
New Additions: TheHotelAmbush, Soupman, Falsehope, Zero, Hitta, Avebury, Anglas, Strangeling, Nanashi
Revision: Totalize (Se/Fi > Te/Ni)
ILE-Ti: Myst, Transkar, LuchoisLurking, JWC3, MadCity, Troll NR 007, Falsehope
ILE-Ne: Geneiouws, Lagerdemon, Cubazoan, Nickelslick, Hitta
ESE-Fi: Chipsnunderwear, Suz, Inumbra, Subteigh, Kalinoche, FlutteringShyx
ESE-Si: Mu4, Wacey, Xerx, Esaman, KrigtheViking, Hacim
LII-Ti: N0ki, Muddy, Reactance, User Name, Bertrand
LII-Ne: Kimuchi/kimu, Zero
SEI-Si: johannesbloem, chriscorey, the whole English
SEI-Fe: BnD, crazedrat, dinky, Neokortex, Pallas Athena
SLE-Se: herzy, mercutio, ananke, idontgiveaf
SLE-Ti: agee, kill4me
LSI-Se: Spider, Missbabydoll, Pole, Aramas
LSI-Ti: Rocky
IEI-Fe: Allie, Pink, SisofNight, Cassandra, Fay, Summer Princess
IEI-Ni: Starfall/Fox, Glam, Elina, Strrrng, Velvet, Penny Dreadful
EIE-Fe: Cuivienen
EIE-Ni: Gilly, Darya, Bain, Sarinana
SEE-Se: Woofwoofl, Handjob, Number9Large
SEE-Fi: Lucas, Aquagraph, Chae, Vogue Paris, Totalize
LIE-Ni: Ineffable, Moonraker, Avebury
LIE-Te: Ashton, FDG, Expat, Invisiblehim, Narc, Anglas
ESI-Se: DiscoJoe, EJArendee, Jet City Woman, MisterNi, Scarletluxx, Amber/Rosewood, Strangeling
ESI-Fi: Lungs, Golden, Ouronis, Radio, Suedehead, Galen, Kore/Persephone, Delilah, the Locust
ILI-Ni: Scapegrace, Korpsey, Krieger, Cpig, InvisibleJim
ILI-Te: Marie, Mensupermateriam, Aestrivex, Crispy, Soupman
SLI-Si: Words, Stray, Scarper
SLI-Te: kim, daft punk, directorabbie, pookie, Jessica, may, supremacist
LSE-Te: Absurd, JimBean
LSE-Si: William, JackOliverAaron/Echidna1000, BurningIce, Timmy, Smilingeyes, Laurie’s Crusader
IEE-Ne: Elizathomason, UDP, Sapphire, Syrup De Gem, Pinoline, Azbestos, Nanashi
IEE-Fi: Finale, Airman/airborne, Adam Strange, Prince Andrei, Niffer
EII-Ne: Aylen, Epheme, Wasp
EII-Fi: Maritsa/beautiful sky, silke, sol, zero, mikemex, IBTL, Contra, Tela/Arachne, Olimpia, TheHotelAmbush
Last edited by Kill4Me; 03-23-2018 at 12:40 AM.
@thehotelambush Guess your heresy was so intense that it corrupted your Ti into Fi.
Last edited by Muddy; 03-16-2018 at 03:15 AM.
HotelAmbush (EII) supervises Myst (ILE) on the Se PoLR of INFj's and INTj's thread:
Myst's next post:
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...nd-INTjs/page9
It's what about psychology is - about your internal, including thoughts, emotions and other motives which "explain events". Socionics is about which types have some internal traits as more expressed and how this affects their behavior.
It's called a "model" and can be checked experimentally on your behavior prognosis, while before staying as hypothesis.
Your strange not understanding of what Socionics is used for may relate to your possible weak nonvalued Ne. Such types are more nervous when other people think about their internal motives. So being on this forum it would be more comfortable for you to think it's like about other.
> It doesn't give Ni like that.
It's Ne. And it's what psychology does indirectly or directly. The last, as you may use N methods for your opinion too, like in nonverbal typing.
@Viktor more LSI, than SLE
I'm revising Niffer's type to IEE-Fi based on her VI:
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...-Thread/page51
It's a perfect match for IEE-Fi in Socionics New Wave....her VI isn't gruff enough for SLI-Si. Although SLI is much different than IEE, Ne/Fi is a very adaptable cognition, that's why so many of them make good actors and actresses.
A lot of the members on my list are already VI or video confirmed. Typically member's pictures fit with my typing of them even before I see their VI, but on the rare occasion the VI points towards a totally different type, I'll give it another look.
Last edited by Kill4Me; 03-18-2018 at 06:58 AM.
you're not typing IEE you're typing instances of demonstrative ethics in general on that page
https://socioniks.net/article/?id=200
not all of those are irrational types, but they're each demonstrative expressions clustered around a certain ethical nexus... its essentially a hodgepodge of nuanced ethical "looks" you've clumped together as all being IEE. true IEE could probably pull off any of those, but it is a weird way to get at what "IEE" represents, because possibly none of those people are actually IEE. its a weird outward-in way to get to IEE. an analogy would be like cataloguing a hundred sports cars, none of which are actually a ferrari, and saying this is what a ferrari is, when its more like what all those cars have in common if you put them together and keep only their strongest aspects you might get a ferrari. you're sort of obliquely pointing at something, and it is IEE in some way, but its a loose visual association. if brad changed his pose the next minute he could be LSI by this method, and it would be true, he would be representing LSI in that minute. but you are typing mere shell not coreAn irrationally-ethical smile is also called sly. I think because she is deceptive, veils real feelings. Behind her hide the alarm or, conversely, arrogance and self-confidence.
anyway its sort of fascinating to see how other people view the world and psychologically profile people. I can see how manipulative Fe can totally control them, because it literally shifts their reality. like a real no shit changeling
Last edited by Bertrand; 03-18-2018 at 09:17 AM.
I know what psychology is about - my MA is in cognitive psychology.
And no, Socionics is NOT to be used to believe it offers a way to definitely see internal motives without proof. Absolutely not.
No scientific psychology model is to be used for that, either.
The explaining of events is the Ni, I should've added that note.> It doesn't give Ni like that.
It's Ne. And it's what psychology does indirectly or directly. The last, as you may use N methods for your opinion too, like in nonverbal typing.
@Bertrand are you saying you think I look as the excerpt you quoted? I wasn't making a sly face lol. I was making a neutral smile one. My face is just shaped that way (maybe in part the asian genetics).