"All warfare is based on deception" — Sun Tzu
Still, the quote is "The meek shall inherit the earth". Interesting, probably because in the end evil self destructs, like ****** did. And those anecdotes (?) of tyrannical kings killing their own sons. There was even a painting of that.
Didn't know the fuhr*r was banned here.
Same shit. Different minute with you. Don't care which of those know-it-all nobodys disagree with me. You're an LII in my book & an ass eating one at that
This thread is great
And you’re an LSE. You’re a weak pussy who can’t stand emotional expression or actual logic. You clearly are Ti ignoring for what I know, you socially retarded cat boy piece of shit that doesn’t have a fucking brain. You clearly valued Te and Ne, and devalued Ti and Fe.
There’s no fucking way that I’m a Ne valuer or Se PoLR. I think we already go over that. Not dealing with possibilities, being a broken record, and not tolerating dissent are examples of me not being Ne valuer. You don’t followed Socionics system at all.
Except the fact that I am not crying at all. I am just angry, and anger motivates me to use force against you. If this is real life, I would’ve gone physical. There’s a difference between anger and crying, you socially retarded and inept cat boy moron. You clearly don’t value Fe. You’re a serious type not merry. An LSE is what you are.
The fact that I want to stab you in the face is an indication of Se lead.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I’m strong willed. I’m strong enough to knock you out in sight and fight you until I win. I don’t play D&D. Fuck that nerdy shit.
Defending my honor and reputation is street talk. If someone disrespect me, they get retaliation. That’s how it is in the street. That’s simple Se.
Of course, a socially inept person who doesn’t value Fe and Se (like you) obviously doesn’t understand it.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You guys are dorks. lol
Just quit giving a shit what people say, especially about your type. All it is is an opinion, a perspective. Sometimes pretty damn interesting to what people think or have to say imo lol …It’s very liberating to quit caring so much
Well, you can't blame a gorilla for fighting another gorilla, I guess.
Anyway. Tim & Stray Cat have similar arguing/fighting style. I’m sorry to break it to you two
Not trying hard. I am who I am, you wimpy cum junkie motherfucking shithead. You’re not SLE as you don’t value Ti. You’re a LSE who value Te. Meanwhile, I rationalize using Ti creative, you bitchass cunt.
Honor and reputation is very Se and Fe. I applied it everywhere. Something that you don’t use because you’re a boring ass uptight Te valuer. There’s no logic in you.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@DEAD did say you’re repetitive so look yourself in the mirror. Sounds Ne valuing to me.
I hope BOTH of you end up with a hot dual like this SLE (Adam) and his GF
https://youtu.be/n50DZvVAulM
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Well if there’s any conciliation I feel a hit to my Se POLR since I feel like no one is noticing me… pay attention to meeeeeee lol
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That’s not the definition of Si HA. That’s Se counterattacks and threats. God, you’re terrible at typing people. Clearly you’re Ti ignoring LSE.
Also, I’m not Democratic. I’m aristocratic. I normally tend to give generalized judgement on people in groups. People accused me of being “racist” because I generalize people into groups. Just because I just mentioned someone, that doesn’t imply democracy.
@roger557, People have been saying that for years. I think it’s a lot like life; some parts get better, some get worse. And then everything changes.