wow @Fay IEI seals the deal
wow @Fay IEI seals the deal
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
SLE vibe. Interesting. I am attracted to some SLEs. I really like Mark Cuban. My best friend (cactagon on here) is Intj. His older brother is SLE and him and I sometimes speak the same language however I find it annoying how he supervises my friend. Then again maybe it's just a brotherly love thing.
As for how I come off, I have pretty bad ADHD so there is a sense of hyperactivity I have that honestly annoys some people or is misinterpreted.
So far I've been typed SLI by someone who knows about socionics who I've met a few times briefly IRL. now SLE. Also gotten SEE. MAYBE I have multiple personalities ; )
In theory, I think the same. That's why I prefer to use the term ethics rather than morals. Morals feels more like what religion would want you to accept, it feels very impersonal and anti-intellectual.
However, I do have a very strong sense of personal values.
I also like to take a philosophical approach to apprehending ethics, rather than accept whatever authorities may tell me to do. Initially, I don't think my ethical values are intellectual in nature, but philosophy helps to make sense of it all.
For example I think consequentialism, deontology and virtue ethics are all useful when appreciating the ethics behind actions. Actions need to be beneficial to people, but this can't be the only criteria because often there are conflicting interests and there are very few, if any universally beneficial actions. So you need deontology, some things should be a question of principle (the value of life is one such thing, and no, I am not talking about abortion, but about how life is valuable in a broader sense). So murder is always wrong, though obviously in some cases we might not all agree on what constitutes a murder. And the intent is important too, in murder cases for example, it often means the difference between murder and manslaughter. I can't see ethics as merely a question of fitting in with society's values.
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
DEAD SLE
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I am kindly wishing for typological suggestions once more~ in fact, I will no longer be posting or replying here for free; you must type me for more content!
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
Have you taken this test?
https://www.16personalities.com/free-personality-test
Describe how it’s like being led with Ne and ignoring Ni
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Luckily nobody needs to type me because I am unequivocally EIE
I thought Aaron seemed beta extrovert, but maybe it’s his enneagram or something
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Fe lead vs Fe demo have a very different “feel” to it. Fe lead tries to get others involved with them. Involved in singing together, laughing, sharing stories, etc. Fe lead wants attention on them while they’re participating with everyone else. They want group involvement.
Fe demo wants the masses to single them out and pay attention on them specifically. They want to stand out from the crowd and have attention directed at them. They make the shittiest team players even though they still have 4D Fe.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Demo function is very strong and visible but always used in service of the valued functions, it's never the point in itself.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
For SEE, it’s recognition achieving what they want (Fi in service of Se). Renaldo Cristiano is a good example. He wanted to stand out as the best soccer/football player even though he’s in a team sport.
For IEE, just want attention as a distraction to themselves and distract others from productivity. They’re pointless, senseless things.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Again, a lot of this is conjecture and you originally said "Attention from the masses" which I don't understand how you are linking that to valued Fi. Achieving what one wants for an SEE must be for the sake of achievement in the Se sense. Their goals are not based in Fe.
People *dont* value their demonstrative.
EIE-Fe Creative 7w8 748 Sx/So VELF
Also I dont care who says what on a forum. People can say whatever they like, I'm going by theory
EIE-Fe Creative 7w8 748 Sx/So VELF
I *never* said they cannot, I said it isnt their goal. It's not integral to their sense of self and values, they dont do it to that *end*.
It also doesn't say how they connect with students, it might as well be on personal, one on one basis and not as a crowd. Yes, many Fi creatives can be pop stars and deploy their demo to convincingly play that role, but they arent in it for the aim of playing with audiences for its own sake.
EIE-Fe Creative 7w8 748 Sx/So VELF
I don't get how people see so many similarities between Thor and Aaron? They are both musician rock-stars iirc but that's where similarities end.
Thor is a baroque travelling performer-bard who riles up people with flamboyant tales of long-lost Love and pains that are yet to come. He dashes through the woods of this forum and radiates a completely different pinkish/violet aura of warmth even when angry, something about poise I guess.
Aaron is the magician-harlequin of the Circus that turns into a Horror Show at night and instead of rabbits pulls out bird intestines out of children's mouths, traumatising them and their parents, idk. That stuff is still hilarious to me simply in how shocking the imagery of his quips is, I kinda like it. irlol effect 10/10
He is a bit more of a wildcard and he doesn't even have a color to his radiance, instead it's the whole rainbow prism.
I don't necessarily favour one above the other btw, i love you both (), but to me they are clearly different types. What makes them look very similar are the enneagram fix and an emphasis on Creative subtype in DCNH imo
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector