You still didn't stop to think about it.
Wrong, while I did write in a strong style about your disconnect from reality, I provided actual explanations about the topic too. Quote those too to be consistent.......Like I said I'm not going to repeat the explanations that all went over your head.
Well these are the gist of explanations you provided in regards to the question of your type
Good luck proving that this is Ne dom."Also if the quoted sentences are Ne dom then you are Ne dom... and everyone else is, too."
No, not at all. Everyone doesn't cognize like that.
Wasn't identical. So no hypocrisy. But you will never stop and think about what I said about that.Squark is just pointing out the hypocrisy. The logic was identical to the logic used in the Peterson thread eight days ago where I made a post using Jung to define elements.
So the rest really went over your head and this is all you managed to pick up from what I said.You clicked constructive for that post. Then in a post just Four days later on this thread you claimed that this identical application of definitions from Jung's book was "directly matching MBTI logic" and concluded it to be an "idiotic reading". You stated that Jung wasn't God and that although only some of his stuff was just ...'ok'...., needed an update in favor of information from "advances" in the science of psychology; though, you never actually name these advances.
If you want to hear about the advances, ask.
You are listing unconnected things again.Not long after that, HotelAmbush notified a post declaring to you that the Jung/MBTI blockheads will never understand Socionics (a post you clicked like for) and suggested you stop wasting your energy. In your next post, you said you were done "explaining" things.