Please type.
Please type.
From VI you could make the one in blue glasses ILE, but both of them seemed ethical in the interview.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Could be, but he reminds me much more of Si creative. Staying Alive is very S, I mean, it says staying alive.
About the attractiveness, I find them more likely hilarious. Look at that hair in their bellies. Their fashion sense was very cheesy, and why on earth did they sing like women?
My IEI sister makes fun of me sayin that I sing like the beegees (males singing like women), because my voice is very deep so when I try to sing I sound like them.
Do you like them? lol. I guess they fit a certain 'spirit' of the time for lack of a better way of putting it. Their music seems Si/Ne to me but i can't go beyond that type-wise since I've not looked into the members individually.
They generally seem Ne/Si I agree with Delilah on that.
Their style is great. It's a good combination of cheesy and masculinity.
I always thought that Barry was very attractive, and I am not even gay.
I remember when seeing a video or picture with them for the first time. It's something about the style that really fits them. The smile, the fluffy hair, their natural personalities etc.
Good music, thanks for bringing them up.
They have some really cool chord progressions in for example "You should be dancing"
Last edited by Tallmo; 03-19-2018 at 07:10 PM.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Barry seems Creative subtype.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
"I can tell by the way you VI on skype, you're a Jungian
More time to type"
They're shiny and hairy. It's like someone spliced the DNA of Burt Reynolds and Liberace, then amped the campiness up to Roger Moore era Bond levels.
You know what's weird and creepy and doesn't make sense - unless you look at it like Adam Strange's observation that people are seeking patterns and they find them?
That afternoon after you posted this thread and I wrote in it, I was clicked on a facebook story instagram of a person I follow, something I never really do, and so weird, it featured him shirtless, twitching his pecs, with swirling psychedelic colours in the back ground, to the beat of STAYIN ALIVE..........!
I know, just random chance that this guy would have the same BeeGees song on his video, I mean its a common song... things like that have been happening to me for months. I know, not connected, it just seemed so coincidental though.
You know what else is weird, @whodat? You and I both began our posts with the same word.
Lol.
Look I know how it seems to you... I get it, and on one hand, yeah, zero correlation, but on the other hand, the hand that is psychology, something about these acausal events occuring on the same day, with a facebooker I was on the fence about (do I like him, not like him, feel uncertain about?) I'm taking it as a sign. It gave me goosebumps, and I'm a athiest. Still, you have to wonder what movement, forces, both inner and outter, are steering our lives, if we choose it?
Remember the pupil of your I is a black void.
I assign value to that stuff according to its predictive power.
There are lots of coincidences and lots of correlations, but which of them are actually useful in predicting future behavior?
@Director Abbie illustrated this best when she was talking to @Hitta about his Vedic Astrology. Based on her birth chart, she asked him to predict what she did last week.
Well, that's your strength. I kind of suck at trusting the present.
They had good sound engineers. Maybe we should type them instead
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
AHH HAH HAH
Robin Gibb EIE
This is how they vibe to me; you can disagree.
* Barry: SEE
* Robin: ESI
* Maurice: don't know; could be ethics
Barry SEE
Maurice IEI