Gay SLI?/Derail
I could tell that you were joking. I could also tell that she was "joking" but not in the way where she's trying to be funny. She just seems to like to annoy people on the Internet in lieu of having friends or hobbies (unless she still does New Age stuff).Originally Posted by Arachne
You mistake strong interest in occult and metaphysical knowledge with "New Age". It's ok, rookie mistake.
Tell us about your friends and hobbies? I have two seconds to read all about it. I am sure your future includes a lot of screaming "get off my lawn you damn kids!" while you neglect your 50 cats and personal hygiene.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I don't need to tell you anything. Show, don't tell. I dare you to do the same.You mistake strong interest in occult and metaphysical knowledge with "New Age". It's ok, rookie mistake.
Tell us about your friends and hobbies? I have two seconds to read all about it. I am sure your future includes a lot of screaming "get off my lawn you damn kids!" while you neglect your 50 cats and personal hygiene.
Also, New Age is New Age by any other name and smells just as "sweet," and the future doesn't exist yet and that's why it's the future.
Aylen's right. That's why there's a name for the "white light" occultists and New Agers. They are quite different in terms of character compared to the other people who are interested in the occult. Specific subject matter isn't enough for a type determination. You have to understand that person's perspective on a certain topic or theme to know how to type them correctly.
I think that's subjective, and I'm not even typing Aylen. I'm just calling Michael Teachings and whatever New Age, because it is, like a spade is a spade. She's into Spiral Dynamics and Indigo Children, not sacrificing goats on a full moon for crying out loud.
Since when do you have to be into sacrificing goats on a full moon to be an occultist? xD
It is you who is wrong.
Attempts at 'reframing' it to be I need to rethink it - whilst providing zero against my logic. Or zero to show anyone who's into occult/new age as actually happy, just shows you to be a shyster.
It is you who needs to 'rethink'. I'll leave it to you to do that. Hopefully you'll come to your senses, if you have any left.
Unlike you I do not appoint myself the ultimate judge of other people's happiness or morality. That kind of hubris is between you and your god to work out. You asked me a question I will not pretend to know. My conscience is clear.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I don't apoint myself as anything. I am asking for an example of a new age/occultist who isn't behind the scenes, angry, has psychological issues, nightmares. If you can't provide that (you can't), we're through with this conversation.
Perhaps the issue is that you are spiritually blind, and thus can't understand people who are not.
I think he has a point. I don't hate everything labelled "New Age" or "occult" but I think Aylen just equivocates things to the point where she can make anything "mean" whatever she wants. That's anti-Logos in the Greek philosophy sense.
Moving your occult/new age stuff it to a de-rail thread is at least a start
I didn't introduce it into the gay SLI thread. It doesn't belong there and I didn't even want to talk about it since I would have to explain my journey along the way. No one here knows where I am spiritually but some know where I am at philosophically. You should know better than to pull this kind of thing.Moving your occult/new age stuff it to a de-rail thread is at least a start
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Your "spirituality" is part of your philosophy. It's just bad philosophy that goes unscrutinized. I don't care what your motives for getting into those things are. New Age is New Age. A rose is a rose, not only by any other name, but no matter what you do with it.
// tries to find what is "new age"
resume: it's something new and mostly about age
rather eclectic stuff without clear borders
Last edited by Sol; 03-08-2018 at 09:44 PM.
the irony of the girl whose avatar featured the all seeing "I", sorry, eye.
new age is like the secret at this point. actually the secret is 2008. new age transfered over to yoga satsangs atm, face book culture, star child moon beam dolphin earth thumpers shamanism 2.0
What the hell are you talking about.the irony of the girl whose avatar featured the all seeing "I", sorry, eye.
new age is like the secret at this point. actually the secret is 2008. new age transfered over to yoga satsangs atm, face book culture, star child moon beam dolphin earth thumpers shamanism 2.0
Its pretty clear to those that know what Im talking about. Try and keep up.
They say that if you can't explain something to a 5 year old child, you don't really understand it.
Reason and logic are not the enemies of magic or the occult.
I just thought your thoughts seemed jumbled and incoherent, maybe I am not on your level or whatever it is, I wonder though if you yourself understand what you are saying. It doesn't seem to me like you do, I could be wrong though.
If I have to explain it I will try later today or sometime in the near future. Although its not really that big a deal.
aylen doesnt strike me as new age, just superficially and probably for some entertainment with the astrogy stuff. lavos hit it and i hope don;t quit it
You are.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
