The16types Typings Spreadsheet

[DirectorAbbie]

Many of you remember the old spreadsheet, but it had gotten messy and cluttered with inactives, so I was encouraged to make a new one. @Raver is my assistant. There is a seperate tab for enneagram that can be seen at the bottom.

Here It Is

-You may add forumites to the bottom of the far-left column (or add-a-row in alphabetical order) and I can adjust the format later.
-You may input your own self-typing. That is your box. (If you are 100% sure of someone else's self-typing and think they might not get to it, you can add that in too. But that's not your box.)
-You are entitled to one column in both socionics and enneagram tabs. You can pick your own font and color your own name at the top and add notes and personalize it. If you need a column, take an available blank one. This is the column you use to tell the world (or the forum) what you type other forumites.
-If you really don't want to be included, you can ask to have your name removed. But that would make people sad. (Don't remove anyone on your own. That's up to Raver and myself.)

[Tallmo]

Great! I hope many will participate

EDIT: I noticed the spreadsheet has a history function so one can see recent changes to the document. Perfect for spying on people

[Chae]

Instantly bookmarked, too. Everyone participate

[Chae]

Wahh..... Excellent I have just opened my column.

Abbie

[The Reality Denialist]

It is probably wise to protect your own column. Select the letter of the column, right click and select Protect area (I don't have English version).

[Chae]

It is probably wise to protect your own column. Select the letter of the column, right click and select Protect area (I don't have English version).

Thanks, good idea. It was "Bereich schützen" here somewhere at the bottom.

[Hope]

It will be better if ppl keep reasonable spaces for their typings and use decent colors. Changing text color is enough, no need for highlighting texts (we all are seeing that you are there), It makes reading more simple and doesnt hurt the eyes of ppl.

[Chae]

It will be better if ppl keep reasonable spaces for their typings and use decent colors. Changing text color is enough, no need for highlighting texts (we all are seeing that you are there), It makes reading more simple and doesnt hurt the eyes of ppl.

Just mention @Troll Nr 007 and me. Now your turn, step up. I wanna see your column.

[Hope]

Just mention @Troll Nr 007 and me. Now your turn, step up. I wanna see your column.

It was for everyone not just you two. Other ppl could think in doing the same. Thank you for changing it.

[Satan]

seems no-one is into typing me.

[Exodus]

seems no-one is into typing me.

you poor thing

[Satan]

you poor thing

ikr, i'm full of despair!

[Number 9 large]

seems no-one is into typing me.

Are u even on this forum

[Not A Communist Shill]

Calling people "inactives" sounds like some sinister term from Blade Runner. I prefer the term "ex-users", because this suggests they have overcome their addiction.

[bgbg]

Calling people "inactives" sounds like some sinister term from Blade Runner. I prefer the term "ex-users", because this suggests they have overcome their addiction.

lol

[Skepsis]

Calling people "inactives" sounds like some sinister term from Blade Runner. I prefer the term "ex-users", because this suggests they have overcome their addiction.

They are clean.

[Raver]

Calling people "inactives" sounds like some sinister term from Blade Runner. I prefer the term "ex-users", because this suggests they have overcome their addiction.

I've quit this forum and Socionics plenty of times for months or even years and I just ended up going to other forums that were even more addictive. So I think this place and Socionics is not too bad as long as you don't look at it religiously. Taking it all with a grain of salt is what I learned from leaving this place.

Having the Socionics filter on in everyday life can be fun, but it can also be very disappointing if you don't realize that it's just a filter that alters your perception of others around you. Socionics is a perspective with some basis on reality, but it is limited in scope so it should not be taken too seriously.

[at sirac son of sirac]

@Kill4Me (should be interesting )

[Chae]

Fixed, begrudgingly!

@Subteigh what happened?

Pls don't forget the enneagram page everyone.

[Chae]

I'll add @sorrows.

[Chae]

Thanks & thanks for helping me pick 2w1

Always a pleasure

[at sirac son of sirac]

@Daisy

[User Name]

Just added my row and column, great idea!

[Chae]

Just added my row and column, great idea!

Ah, so cute. Had to search for you first! I added you on the E-sheet also.

[Tallmo]

I would be good to put the link to the spreadsheet somewhere visible. Like in the main menue.

Now when it is buried in "Anything goes" it will slowly fade when people forget it.

It's hard to keep this spreadsheet alive because there are no discussions here that will keep the thread fresh in "New posts".

[DirectorAbbie]

Now when it is buried in "Anything goes" it will slowly fade when people forget it.

It's stickied, so it'll always be on the first page.

[User Name]

Just wondering: is there any hidden meaning behind @Subteigh's column?

[lavos]

I don't appreciate the decision to not include some legendary and controversial members I had added (Gilly, discojoe, ashton, UDP, rick, expat, galen). They may be inactive, but it's easy to run into their posts browsing the forum.

[DirectorAbbie]

I don't appreciate the decision to not include some legendary and controversial members I had added (Gilly, discojoe, ashton, UDP, rick, expat, galen). They may be inactive, but it's easy to run into their posts browsing the forum.

What do others think of including these people?

[User Name]

What do others think of including these people?

Absolutely no problem for me.

[Not A Communist Shill]

What do others think of including these people?

Why not have a secondary page?

It might be better to have this thread in the General Socionics Discussion subforum, and stickied for the time being.

[Tallmo]

What do others think of including these people?

I dislike the worship of these old forum gods.

But its interesting how even internet forums give birth to mythological beings. Even if its just very early stages of mythology.

[Raver]

I got a few alternative typings, which I like. Those are some types that I have seriously considered in the past. They're not too different from my self typing as well.

What do others think of including these people?

Sure, why not? The legendary inactives are worth typing at least. Someone who got ten posts 10 years ago though, probably not worth typing.

Btw, may I suggest moving this thread to what's my type and stickying it there? It might possibly fit better there than anything goes.

[Chae]

What do others think of including these people?

They're controversial with good reason. We have to make sense of the spreadsheet's purpose first though. If it is for people finding out about their own types then they can be excluded. If it is for everyone finding out about everyone, then they also have to be excluded as they don't participate themselves. It's aiming for democratic synergy and mutuality after all. If it is mere documentation for its own sake, then: green light! What I secretly suspect though: What was indicated was a question of deserving and relevance/popularity. Then it has to be subjective which is more difficult. I'd have some aversion to mindless worship and legacy cult but they'd be equal in the list and even at a disadvantage since they can't vote? My feeling - as a second generation member that is not too familiar with them - says we can try it, no harm's done, and see what happens. It would be interesting to have consensus there.

[Suz]

What do others think of including these people?

I think they should be included. They've been an integral part of our community!

[The Reality Denialist]

There is a possibility to add the16types cemetery tab or something.

[Chae]

The PoLR leaves me shook We can't do that lmao. They ain't dead literally, hopefully. Figuratively and maybe yes.

[Exodus]

The PoLR leaves me shook We can't do that lmao. They ain't dead literally, hopefully. Figuratively and maybe yes.

Can confirm at least 5 of those people are alive and well.

[Chae]

Can confirm at least 5 of those people are alive and well.

Good to know then

[Spermatozoa]

Done.