Calling people "inactives" sounds like some sinister term from Blade Runner. I prefer the term "ex-users", because this suggests they have overcome their addiction.
Calling people "inactives" sounds like some sinister term from Blade Runner. I prefer the term "ex-users", because this suggests they have overcome their addiction.
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
lolOriginally Posted by Subteigh
They are clean.
I've quit this forum and Socionics plenty of times for months or even years and I just ended up going to other forums that were even more addictive. So I think this place and Socionics is not too bad as long as you don't look at it religiously. Taking it all with a grain of salt is what I learned from leaving this place.
Having the Socionics filter on in everyday life can be fun, but it can also be very disappointing if you don't realize that it's just a filter that alters your perception of others around you. Socionics is a perspective with some basis on reality, but it is limited in scope so it should not be taken too seriously.
Last edited by Raver; 02-28-2018 at 09:32 PM.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote