MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
IMPORTANT: If you read "hot" or things like that in my column, please notice that it's not me but some idiots who are playing with the spreadsheet. My Ti-ness would never do that, you know...
KEEP IT LIGHT AND KEEP IT MOVING
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Gosh. I really want to be an Anonymous Chinchilla.
Reason is a whore.
I don't know if he's good at it, but he does do it a lot.
To me he strains too much, I think he's over-reaching himself and his intellect without realizing it (it's been noticed by others also, that, at least comparatively on here, he's not that smart.)and makes people make a fool out of themselves, which is amusing
I do think it's funny when he 'trolls' Aylen for instance, because, he always comes out the worst.
Still, it's not everyone's cup of tea. being trolled, or 'trolled', as he tries. I'd prefer him to put his money where his mouth is, put his name in the spreadsheet to be typed, and even put his own typings on, but, it is what it is.
Thank you for your explanation.
BTW I heard on the rumor mill that you do have a dislike for Bertrand, and have said as much in several posts. From what i've gathered, you do have a dislike for Aylen. Complicated politics Just stick with your own opinions, too much F stuff and drama for me
Anyway your post was good because it showed who likes Bertrand (trolls vs non trolls), so thanks.
Oh, I think you're OK too in my book.
It's like this today haha
I know it's not the 70s but I can't help but be a little partial to the 80s/90s:
https://youtu.be/SkNl5JiagW4?t=46
Remember to check the tabs and always wear column protection.
Apparently hidden tab called solid shit is the real deal.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
*Loud noises*
Who wants coffee?
@Director Abbie if I'm not mistaken someone has added crazedrat's real name to the sheet.
But the greatest tension is attained when the "PEDANTS" accuse the "Moralists" of violating some ethical requirements. "MORALISTS" (and especially ethics) at the same time feel as if they are forced to worship the "fetish" - a stupid impression made from the most miserable and most primitive version, remotely resembling their EGO program - the area of their innate professionalism, according to which each of them feels like a congenital "lawmaker", an "expert", a "judge", but certainly not a servant performer of the most crude and primitive of her designs.
trololololololololo
The only thing Imma cut is the guy who does this and isn't even sneaky about it
Last edited by Chae; 03-03-2018 at 11:32 AM.
lol ooo's entries just made my night
pff the funny thing about this is that i was trying to be serious
@sirac
Schermata 2018-03-04 alle 08.11.53.png
yes? so sweet of u
Super ego relations are among the worst (from descriptions, and self experience) when they get closer, but, usually I have good feelings for the IEIs on here.
I meant to ask you. There was a poster on here who appeared here briefly, they sounded exactly like you, and they were asking why their high emotionalism was Fe and not Fi. Then they disappeared. Anyway I thought they might be you, testing out to see if you were Fe or Fi. If I remember who they were, i'll link it, they were just like you.
Anyway, I know you weren't trying to be serious I think it's a 'merry', non 'serious' quadra thing to do to lighten the mood. Fi types would be inclined to take such value statements with a little more seriousness. Just my opinion. We're not all type of course and sometimes we just do stuff.
If you want to know (if it matters), I don't dislike you and I think you're OK
I was really trying to be serious lolol my plan was to type all the list, I actually have been thinking about making a list of all the people on here for a while, I have a paper on my notes with all the people of the forum I've typed, but then, on there, I felt compelled to follow the column, and in the end I felt ashamed not to know most people in there lol so I gave up before even starting.. let's say so.
I had no other nicknames aha
and yeah ok, sure, wtv you say sirac, as if I havent seen you type IEIs as EII just because you liked them, and ur passive-aggressive way to turn people u dont like into other quadras.. I mean, don't play it nice just because I called u out on the dynamic of super-egos, the things u say to other people about how u feel about them, underestimating a specific group, can be offending if then u put "me" or anyone else in the group u showed to underestimate, js
well, this pattern is common on this forum, not blaming u to follow the crowd
@at sirac son of sirac @bgdjf
All cozy in the 70s? Good, let me ruin it for you. This thing exists:
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
I hate you.
I don't like everyone who I type as Delta. Some people I like I type as other quadra. It's all good.
Edit: Now that I think about it, i'm struggling to think about any Deltas I don't like. Hmmm. There's some I may not have much in common with, or to talk about with, but, I don't think there's a 'dislike'. Hmm i'll maybe think about that one. Interesting. Thanks for mentioning it.
People say a lot of things, I am just being honest, but, as you mention it, that sort of thing is Fi valuing.Originally Posted by ooo
I know an IEE male at work, we don't socialize much, but we get on quite well. He tries to be pleasant with everyone, but in times alone we share our opinions and likes and dislikes about people, quite Fi judging I suppose it would seem. Anyway it's not the best, it just sort of happens. But, like him, I try to be pleasant with all people, but Fi is as Fi does at times.
With ESE I work with we talk about what people do. With IEE it's how we feel. There's some crossovers, and some differences. Subtle, but existing.
Cool
Last edited by at sirac son of sirac; 03-04-2018 at 06:51 PM.
I don't know anyone who doesn't do this in some extent. Telling people how we feel about them is an essential part in establishing relationships..... ugh.
If I say, "they're all a bunch of mamabangers I hate them all, but hey, u not so bad among them all, I do fine with u! <3 <3!" this can be Fi in your twisted idea of what socionics gotta be like, but it's just plainly rude if u say it infront of everyone for everyone to see... Fi? think again.
ps, I'm sure your IEE friend doesn't share such opinions in front of all, as well
@ooo,
Well, any socionics I use, it's either from articles which can be referenced, or it's my own observations, which can be supported by referenced articles, and, or, it's consistent with the overall theory too.
So, I use this to type you as IEI. I don't know why it's a big deal. You type as INFP in MBTI, yet you want to be ESI in socionics. It doesn't make sense to change two dichotomies like that. It's describing two different entities. Although, sometimes you change it from ESI to EII. But, i've found with Fe types, often their language is different. Especially Fe in Se quadra, it's like it's fun to argue or something.
Anyway, it's all good, you have a good day/morning/night whichever you are
look sirac, u can type me all u want and display ur bias all u like. what i was saying is that it's simply rude, to me, to being called IEI from someone who in more occasions threw offending notes at IEIs and whatnot. can u get the logic? ok bye.
rude is u telling me what i think of myself lol, as if u know
rude is u intromitting the conversations i was having with someone else just to extrapolate the part u want to point out... as usual
rude is that u keep applying standards (on me) that u don't even follow urself, for ur IR list is full of self typed MBTI P whom u types as J
rude is that u keep forgetting that this is socionics, not MBTI, and that the 2 admittedly don't match 100%
rude is that i told u already to leave me alone, and here u are.
gosh... for ur own concern, yes, i'm calling u 2 both (sol and sirac) out on ur bullshit. come complain that this is not Fi just to share in the next post how Fi are honest and whatnot. let me have a laugh pls