Quote Originally Posted by aster View Post
I don't have a problem with other people being added if people want to type them. The only issue I have with it is if they would want to be added. As Abbie said in the OP, if you don't want to be included, you can ask for your name to be removed. Would these people mind being on the Typing Spreadsheet ? They aren't around to make that decision. You could say that anyone is fair game, but that's really the only problem I see with it, besides getting so many names on there that it's overwhelming, kind of like the last one.
Yes. Definitely true And vice versa: what happens to columns of people that weren't typed at all by anybody in the enneagram tab (there are many more gaps) once it expands? Delete or keep? We'll have to wait to sort it out later.

As for the practical solution, well they don't know they're there in the first place, it's 50-50. Maybe they can be removed when it gets too chaotic and their columns stay mostly unused because fewer people know about them, that could occur.

Best case to keep the overview and find relevant things would be when

- we have a frequency-o-meter that propels the most-used columns to the top But that would ruin the alphabetical order so meh
- we could see percentages of TIM results ("60% voted LSE" or "16 people voted SEI" or something) in the left column so you don't have to scroll to the right so see all the people's votes.