Try VI-ing me?

[para]

@idontgiveaf
Danish! @falsehope
Very informative post. Thank you! I do have trouble seeing myself as Fe-ego, though. I'm pretty socially and interpersonally clumsy. I'm shy and have trouble knowing how and when to express myself. IEI seems more likely of the two, IMO.

[para]

@schwiftyrickty
I know a few SLEs, actually... I don't get along particularly well with the ones i've met, they're too insensitive, simple and seem to not think things through. The ones i know seem very shallow, honestly, and my conflicts with them always arise because they think i'm 'moody' or that i'm too withdrawn. I'm sure i've just had bad experiences, though.

lii.PNG

Here are my results from the extended test.

[para]

.

[Myst]

I definitely identify clearly with alpha values over any other quadra. But, as you said, the search for overarching meaning, the poetically infused descriptions of phenomena and inner life, my general preference of spiritual and psychic subjects over the scientific, and the Ti>Te valuing makes a convincing display of IEI-Ni.

No, you are just the Jung variant of LII

(He was LII too. And I'm jk with the way I worded that but yeah, you share that interest in innert spiritual etc stuff with Jung)