Quote Originally Posted by Duschia View Post
Yeah. Still, I think it's mediocre at best. And (potential) effect size is not high for most anyway. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full...10911003650383
I think it's an interesting dump of raw data, not processed conclusions that should be used without other more reliable information as context. You can sift through it and maybe you find something useful that can be used as yet another supporting viewpoint when dissecting the typical characteristics of types.