Results 1 to 40 of 57

Thread: Type descriptions by Victor L .Talanov

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    esq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    111
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Chae, regarding grain of salt.

    Half of Talanov's associations for my type, I have mixed feelings about. But the other half are okay and even insightful. It is possible that I've had an atypical upbringing for my type.

    Upbringing and personal development can probably break a type away from the typical characterizations shown here. Like a type can probably mold themselves away from their weaknesses if for some reason they underwent a lot of skill training that bolstered those weaknesses.

    So it's necessary to understand that these associations aren't meant to be definitive for every type. They're only claiming that representatives of a type were more likely to have this or that property than an average person was.

    But yeah, some are kind of bizarre. Like an IEE is more likely to have their favorite color as bright yellow? More likely to have their [ring?] finger shorter than their index finger? Their "growth is above average"? They have little melanin and their pigmentation is weak? Are these all accurate?

    But so far, most of them seem fairly feasible and anyway interesting to consider.

  2. #2
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,842
    Mentioned
    1604 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by esq View Post
    @Chae, regarding grain of salt.

    Half of Talanov's associations for my type don't resonate with me. But the other half are okay and even insightful. It is possible that I've had an atypical upbringing for my type.

    Upbringing and personal development can probably break a type away from the typical characterizations shown here. Like a type can probably mold themselves away from their weaknesses if for some reason they underwent a lot of skill training that bolstered those weaknesses.

    So it's necessary to understand that these associations aren't meant to be definitive for every type. They're only claiming that representatives of a type were more likely to have this or that property than an average person was.

    But yeah, some are kind of bizarre. Like an IEE is more likely to have their favorite color as bright yellow? More likely to have their "unnamed" (ring?) finger shorter than their index finger? Their growth is "above average"? In their skin and hair, they have little melanin and their pigmentation is weak? Are these all accurate?
    Talanov was clearly taking a shotgun approach to correlations, but I think that's good, because some randomness can lead to surprising results. We have plastic-coated electrical wire because a cleaning lady accidentally spilled cleaning solution into the wire drawing vat, which previously had been steadily failing to get the plastic to join correctly with the wire.

    Note that Talanov took measures to try to correctly type people, and his sample sizes are in the thousands. This isn't on a Google "if a user visits this shoe site twice, they are a target for pecan ice cream ads" level, but it's the best I've seen so far.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •