Gulenko Update! Getting along with the D subtype
Woah okay, I think he heard us. Amen, Dr. G!? Last time the complaint was that he didn't say anything new but now there he goes. THERE HE GOES.
DCNH is trending again or what
We're up for a typology revolution.
(IT ALSO SAYS HOW TO DEAL WITH DEATH THREATS IN THE THUMBNAIL WHAAAATTT)
It wouldhave been more informative i he told more about interactions between other subtypes than just normalizing.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
I think the theory is that normalizing and dominant are "duals" of sorts.Originally Posted by Troll Nr 007
So I think that if the N do not accept the D than that constellation quickly fall. The H have a similar role towards the C. The D and C are not really that much into each others area. C can be "stopped" first by the N from the group of D.
yes good advice.
There is a "dualization" process between complementary subtypes. So this happens also naturally.
"Be laconic and exact in your expressions"
Ds love thisAnd the more time you spend with Ds, the more laconic you become.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Do they eat your soul?yes good advice.
There is a "dualization" process between complementary subtypes. So this happens also naturally.
"Be laconic and exact in your expressions"
Ds love this
Well,egos are going to be laconic either way
esp. Causal deterministic.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
my gf loves the D
For a C such as myself, interacting with D's is tiring (D's supervise C's in DCNH theory). Anybody know what is Gulenko's DCNH?
Gulenko seems to have strengthened super ego (N/H).
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Was shocked by that cartoon guy for a sec, um what...
I believe so, too. He came up with it, so he can manipulate it to whatever advantage. He's a 5 afterall
I think he is an obvious Normalizer
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
H is the best embodiment of the soul imo, so C is the subtype that eats the soul
D and N are relatively soulless creatures.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Certain souls have weird aftertaste.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Nom nom nom
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote