Make me reasonable and enough arguments - and I'll do.
Make me reasonable and enough arguments - and I'll do.
I'm old school. When a lady have interest to me and I to her, - then we meet IRL. No camera may transfer my charm.
To fit "enough" you'll need to do it many times.
Until she'll unground herself, I may don't worry.
It's pleasure to see how others accept my wisdom.
> Indeed, a woman does usually get somewhat looser over time. You just have to plough her regularly.
All you need is love, Cuivienen, then you'll not be perceived as a looser by a woman. In other case you'll become boring for both you sometimes, despite your and her qualities.
Do not flatter yourself; you have neither intelligence nor wisdom.
I would much rather that you just insulted me without these pretenses of sympathy. You dislike me, so don't pretend to care about me. You clearly lack the courage to express your true feelings directly, but I will not suffer to receive slight after slight. You are a conceited, conniving wretch of a man; the kind that would be pissed upon if we had any honor here.
Your wisdom is just not enough to understand that if you agree with me, then you think me as having wisdom there.
The other your mistake is to say the human with whom you may talk has no intelligence, and hence you controvert to yourself here too.
Also you may notice that my intelligence in logics, as is seen here, is higher than yours.
As you reject evident things, I assume that your intelligence now is not in adequate enough state to continue our discussion. I hope some meds, rest and the reading the words of my Wisdom and Intelligence will make significant improvement on you sometimes.
Also it was interesting to see again, how bad is your T to confirm my opinion about your type and to dispose the opinions of your recent and of someones who may still think you as T type.
Thanks for the pleasure to see you agree with me, at least in what your mental state and intelligence abbilities allow you now.
Keep us informed about how your mental improvement is going. We'll be worry.
P.S. The removing of anger-depressive mask from your avatar that shows your current emotional issues may become a step to your future health.
i'd watch it. cock in hand.
Not.But the situation is similarly unequal.
I don't ask to identify my type.
And >90% people on forums have much lesser typing experience (which also fits to theory) than me, so my opinion has other weight to interest them. If I see someone's behavior is strange for the said type and offer to make typing thread with video, there is good chance the type is other indeed. I also say arguments in such cases sometimes. Chae, Cosmic Teapot, lavos, etc. - behave strangely for the types in their profiles. And to make a video to be sure in their type is not hard for them. They may get problems from own wrong types, I offer them help.
yep. not hard, - senseless
> anyone could argue that they are a better typer than you
In this asylum you may have own typing theme near other one where you try to type someone and disagree with typing of those who does this for many years. But adequate people which may doubt in own type should doubt in own skills too, and take into account for how much and long I type to assume my opinion as interesting. While those who don't doubt will not make video anyway.
P -ersonally, it would be nice to see you
A -gh seriously, everyone's tired when you don't practice what you preach literally everywhere on this hellsite
Y -es you have to expose yourself
B - ecause we want to check out your nonverbals
A -and stick to your own rules please while you do that
C -hae demands it, period
K -idding, do what you want but 13 votes and growing should be a good point
I meant my profit.
> A -gh seriously, everyone's tired when you don't practice what you preach literally everywhere on this hellsite
Because I have no doubts in own type. I ask video in a hope the other person will get or has such doubts.
> Y -es you have to expose yourself
This place is for thoughts' exposion.
> B - ecause we want to check out your nonverbals
I send my condolences, but do not notice my profit still. There are LSE examples in my bloggers list. And I'm not against others thought me as wrong type - this gives lols me often.
> A -and stick to your own rules please while you do that
there are not bad examples already
> C -hae demands it, period
and such Chae have made another hopeless demand in her life
> K -idding, do what you want but 13 votes and growing should be a good point
when you'll gather 100k votes then I'll think. I promise
Last edited by Sol; 10-27-2017 at 11:36 PM.
Yes, there is significant possibility he or any other will type me wrongly, while I'm sure I did it correctly. As a typer Gulenko is not more respected than other experienced. He's known as long-time practitioner-lecturer, by not bad early texts and later doubtful hypothesis which are not taken seriously.
> You know those people better than anyone?
I know them enough to be sure in their types, when I'm sure.
> If you just using a nonverbal things, then are you already aware of something cultural non-verbal things that they showed?
I have no basis to think there are significant cultural distortions in the nonverbal I'm using for typing. In a bad case I'll get contradictive impressions and no sure opinion, or my mistakes may rise a little.
> Do you think that someone who is LSE in your place, is still LSE when that person moved into my place?
Yes. A type is the balance of functions in a person's consciousness, what does not relate to external conditions. Similarly he'll not become left-handed.
> When you're sure about yourself, you put at least 90% as your accuracy score.
90% is the lowest assurance when is said that I'm sure. In concrete cases the % may be higher. I had no doubts in own type from 2003 year, while I'm checking it by IR with many people typed by me IRL and in the net. So it's near 100% still.
> But when others are sure about themselves, you put at most 30% as their accuracy score.
My opinion about skills of others is based on their objective average match, - 20% the highest I saw still, what means the common accuracy should be ~50% and that's bad. Also I see the common match with me where I'm sure - max 30%, what means their accuracy (for me) is < 33%.
While about own skills I decide based on my personal experience, where I see how people fit good to the theory with my types versions and hence I'm sure in those versions, and when my imressions are same after time. 90% is from <10% possible changes in my opinion after some time when I was sure, in conditions when my skills does not change significantly and the quality of typing material is similar. For example, you may see my blogger's list - I'm removing from it some examples regularly, this quantity seems <10%.
Any experienced typer uses similar approach, I suppose.
> I apologize for my argument. I promise I'll delete it at 9am Pacific time tomorrow.
There is nothing to apologize for and no need to delete.