.
Pls jesus V.I. me (video)
.
Last edited by Katalina; 10-21-2017 at 08:39 PM.
Fe type
most thoughts about EIE
They are not necessarily dumb. Sometimes they are just EIE.Originally Posted by Cosmic Teapot
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Monthes are ok. To read books only took me about a month.
The type needs to be understood completely by whole core theory, not just to "find". As some today may find one type, then other, etc. meanwhile correct one could be or not among them. While the other ones do it max for 1 year. Ok, let's say not dumb, but offer other reasons like bad horoscope, for example.
When she'll understand her type is not known, still. Technically to understand, the novice needs to study the typology to beginners level, to type people near and check how IR effects fit to the theory. Only then there will be low chance to change the opinion about own type.
totally agree. F types are not dumb. just don't like to think. it's personal choice, but not the abbility
(without joking - even having similar or higher general IQ, F types may show suprisingly naive thinking)
Fi types don't use so much of bad "words" when are not angry (not the case here)
yes. possible close or same type
ur microexpressions look like @summerprincess! lulz
the speech of a trucker though
Yeah, and Aylen's too a bit.
Lolare into enneagram? If so I think you're 7w8. (sp/sx perhaps?) You're cute.
Edit: I skimmed through your questionnaire post and it sure sounds like 7. Problem-avoidant and need to act optimistic to people while hiding your sad side.
My guess is SEE. I can understand the EIE typing, but I have doubts about that.
I don't think your Fe is conscious. It fits better demonstrative Fe (unconscious).
Your video is a little short though. But from watching 1 minute of you I'd say SEE
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I dunno about either, honestly LOL
I always thought I was an introvert
And seeing as my dumb ass frequently bumps into walls, has no spatial awareness, and frequently forgets what color my own car is, I doubt I'm an SEE
In that case, post a longer video. Like 45 minutes. Then we will be able to see more of your natural self. Now you seemed to be mostly acting.
People will watch 45 minutes. I'm sure I will. It's rare, and good typing material so gives us all a challenge and learning experience, and maybe you'll find your TRUE type
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Hahahah YEAH; I'm exaggerating a lot
I will at some point
I made a video earlier, but yeah; it exceeded 45 minutes, so I wasn't sure if people would watch it.
Have you considered ESI ?
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
ESI makes sense...
Yes, I'm more and more leaning towards ESI.
But 1 minute was a really short video.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
You kinda remind me of Kate Bush, esp the eyes. Beta NF is my guess. You're cool
"In-depth analysis" and VI do not go hand in hand.
That being said, what you actually said in the video was very informative for how long it was. If you actually bothered to do a video questionnaire (the one in my signature for example) it probably wouldn't be hard to type you.
People need correct types, but not in-depth reasoning which they unable even interpret correctly. VI needs skills, like everything to go "hand in hand" with you.
Yeah
I'll keep that in mind ^-^
I thought SEE as well. EIE would be my second guess.
What stands out most to me is an ethical Se-valuing extrovert.
"Like 45 minutes"
I offer to make a series. 45 min everyday, during a couple of years would be ok
How about an Fe creative type, IEI?
Possible, but lesser. IEI are more shy to make such expressive typing clips. While she's more like on a scene.
I'm not sure if this is usually you (and you are just exaggerating) but if that condition holds: ESI.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
God I hope shes ESI and she sticks around and she meets our LIE krew
I hope she isn't and she just gives all the LIEs blue balls instead
i feel like LIEs are in a perpetual state of blue balls ESI or not
in fact an ESI in leather and stilettos making bitches out of them is precisely what they want, because they can finally cast off their silly Ni games and just embrace the Se truth of their existence
which is they're pathetic nerds begging to be shown a mirror
This sounds more like the sexual fantasy of an Infantile male. Oooh good boy, do you like me spanking you that way? Your naughty thing has got so hard! Mommy is going to take very good care of you now, mmm.
LOLOLOLOLOL
I cannot speak for other LIE men on the forum, but I certainly do not wish for a woman to "make a bitch out of" me. Merely the thought of that is enough to make me feel somewhat nauseous.
Now where has this come from, I wonder?
I'm not sure when the S&M thing began being associated with gammas. It seems like very fantastical, aristocratic sex to me. "My sex is so bad and so kinky. I am so naughty". It does strike me as very infantile/adolescent.This sounds more like the sexual fantasy of an Infantile male. Oooh good boy, do you like me spanking you that way? Your naughty thing has got so hard! Mommy is going to take very good care of you now, mmm.
LOLOLOLOLOL
I cannot speak for other LIE men on the forum, but I certainly do not wish for a woman to "make a bitch out of" me. Merely the thought of that is enough to make me feel somewhat nauseous.
Now where has this come from, I wonder?
do you want to end up like adam strange? because this is how you end up like adam strange, brotherThis sounds more like the sexual fantasy of an Infantile male. Oooh good boy, do you like me spanking you that way? Your naughty thing has got so hard! Mommy is going to take very good care of you now, mmm.
LOLOLOLOLOL
I cannot speak for other LIE men on the forum, but I certainly do not wish for a woman to "make a bitch out of" me. Merely the thought of that is enough to make me feel somewhat nauseous.
Now where has this come from, I wonder?
the reason gamma is into S&M has to do with Ni v Se and role reversal between female aggressor and male pseudo aggressor, and the truth being acted out in private, while in polite society it is more like an Ni game being played... its intimacy to get over the Ni bullshit LIE peddles, they want a real relationship but are afraid, ESI has the Fi and Se to break through it so they secretely crave it, despite all their silly outward puffing to the world (getting LIE to admit in public this sort of thing is manifestly against their program and %100 in keeping with their private enjoyment)
not all gammas are into S&M its not a 1:1 pattern, rather its something that crops up in various forms of the victim aggressor relationship and has to do with how people cope with societal expectations and how they experience intimacy in contradistinction to that; so its rooted in the particular circumstances of the parties... however the underlying pattern is organized by Ni/Se
further, anyone can "play" at S&M so its not like deltas or betas or whatever can't put on leather, its gammas that really embody the essence of it though
Last edited by Bertrand; 10-16-2017 at 03:37 PM.
Sometimes there might be legitimate ESIs and this one has very high potential of being one.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
And if they can't be typed ESI they are Alphas
Everyone who asks what type am I is Te seeking
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
maybe someone will present me with some facts if I rattle off a bunch of bullshit
I'm uploading a video questionnaire :^)
.
Last edited by Katalina; 10-21-2017 at 08:40 PM.
Type with strong- (Model G). So, I think IEI, ESI.
On first vid you seemed to be bit ESI-ish.
Based on this I say IEI and this one is far better sample.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
negative defense on 3rd function (Ne) seems to be a pattern--> militates toward ESE, eyebrow movement confirms
Posting Permissions
