er yeah, I get that its a series of three numbers but what is the significance of being it in each slot versus the other or not at all? in other words how does the slot influence how the number is manifest
er yeah, I get that its a series of three numbers but what is the significance of being it in each slot versus the other or not at all? in other words how does the slot influence how the number is manifest
Cass's typing skills are based off stupid stereotypes & thinks she knows everything
That's the only Socionics For Dummies tip I got 4 y'all
Lmao not really. Just don't like when people think they are above everything. Does this - "The existence of a positive feeling can be inferred only indirectly, as it were. Its aim is not so much to accommodate to the objective fact as to stand above it, since its whole unconscious effort is to give reality to the underlying images" ring a bell?Originally Posted by Olimpia
Someone is butthurt?
Yeah, you take this thread too seriously.
If you don't like it, you don't have to follow it.
This is basically a version of "Olimpia's Brain", so.
Who said I was taking it seriously?Yeah, you take this thread too seriously.
If you don't like it, you don't have to follow it.
This is basically a version of "Olimpia's Brain", so.
Hmhm hm....what in the world could this statement mean.....
my mind seems to be stumbling...
OHwait! My socionics classes might come in handy this time... lemme see here ... shifts glasses up my nose shaft as a formality of showing intense focus and begins flipping through pages of a mysterious textbook with a picture of a weird androgynous looking robot thing, almost as if this is something someone would fap to if they were IEI 4s
AHHHH yes! I learned this years ago, silly me!
Originally written by Headmaster Olimpiadore
The amount of butthurt is highly proportional to the amount of (valued) Fi someone possesses.
Actually, many gay guys are Fi ego...
IT IS ALL CLEAR NOW
stfu
LOL
Fi user spotted
dare I say it--? ESI, anyone?
Aggresively pursuing a female all the time is not a good strategy.
It can be a good strategy if she likes you and is a Victim type.
Otherwise, definitely not.
When someone claims to be "ambiverted" and/or they cannot decide between being E or I, they are most likely the Contact subtype.
yeah, I totally vibe with that.. more?
Sounds like Jung. It's terrible English. I'd rather read the German original, though even that can be overly complicated.
Jung is certainly not a Logical type. He's unclear af. Te PoLR. None of his theory is factual and evident.
He's IEI-Ni.
Nah he's LII, said it himself. Unless you think your the master of minds and can get in everyone's head.
If she disagrees with this she's a butthurt esi. Calling it now.
SNATCHED BY NI!!!
what was Jung doing writing in such a convoluted way, he should have just posted a video
Yeeeeeah you go girl
Just because someone says they are a certain type, does not mean they are right.
And yes, even Jung might have been mistyping. Though in his defense, the types as they exist now, did not exist back then. So... I find it to be a mute point to some extent.
Anyhow, he was in a continual "Ni-Ti loop", which is quite common for Inert subtype people. (Being in a "loop" of their Lead and HA functions, that is.) So he "saw" Ni and Ti in himself, when he introspected. Which is not incorrect technically. It is not the whole story, however. And just look at his work, as a whole. It is IEI-Ni af. If you cannot recognize the Ni valuing of it, then... we have different takes on Ni.
Alright so would you disagree with Christians about God, but still consider yourself Christian? What about Muslim & Allah? Doesn't matter what it is, he created this and disagreeing with him would remove the whole point from the story. If you want to create your own typological system, go ahead, but don't consider it anywhere close to Jungian.
suuuup.....
its obviously Jung but Im curious as to what type its describing, sounds like introverted feeling but perhaps not
Yeah, it's jungs introverted feeling.
what's Olimpia's recommendations for the dummies who come from MBTI?
Try to forget everything you've ever known about MBTI when you study Model A.
But then later, don't make the mistake and think that the types are totally different from one another.
I've written about that issue before here.
There is no Socionics except Jung and Augustinavichiute's texts. All other are corrupted and unholly!
lol. So, what about those instances when the great and mighty prophet Augusta writes about such heresies as Reinin's traits? =P Such as in her work, The Theory of Reinin's Traits, published in 1985. . .
such dilemmas such dilemmas, what's a proselyte to do? heheheh
That was a moment of soul weakness when the prophet Augustinavichiute was possessed by unholly demon Reinin. But she fought anyway, as have left a hint in her text (like "it's all raw hypothetic bs, dudes") in the try to deceive the demon. Unfortunally, being possessed even one time, means to stay corrupted forever, so any her texts starting from that moment (and mb previous partly) should not be taken as the blessed ones. All such late texts should be kept in the library of apocryphal writings (underground! with a lot of candles, pentagrams, etc funny stuff) and only people having the most of Faith should be allowed to read them, being able to resist demonic words there.
> such dilemmas such dilemmas, what's a proselyte to do? heheheh
To live in true Faith. Sturdy ignoring all seductions of Reinin and his damned worshippers. Same deal with all absurd and contradictions in holly texts, - as it's not absurd but the Truth which your mind still can't to get correctly! (some reported a weed helped) - so just forget that until future enlightenments. That's the only way of proselytes to the Truth of holly duality.
Does being emotional sensitve imply thatis one of my weaker or stronger functions?
Does make sense for me.
I mean, not to throw shade on this, but this is trivially true--in any description of contact subtype its defined as looking more like their mirrorDoes being emotional sensitve imply that
Does make sense for me.
so to turn around and say "self proclaimed ambiverts are likely contact subtypes" is true by definition because contact subtype is defined by ambiguous ambiversion
it phrases something built in as some kind of prediction
Do you mind a question?
You type yourself as EII, but your style of argumentation is remarkable logical.
My question: I'm quite sensitive, does this rule out thatis one of my ego functions?
Typically I don't act based on my emotions.
I agree with the first part.
strongerDoes being emotional sensitve imply that
Ok. Does that mean if I'm emotional sensitive that
According to Model A I can't have both
Does this make sense?
This thread is Te PoLR.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
What system of sorting people to match a system of abstract descriptions is-valuing at all?
Any theory that lacks falsifiability has evidently no connection to reality. Science is about theories that are testable.
reality is more than what is scientifically falsifiable, they could relate it to phenomenological experience that is "real" primarily in the form of sensing or intuition... Te types care primarily about what works, not about why Ti says it works
Reply With Quote
