This is interesting and I understand.
Basically,
tends to simplify logical constructs until a universal principle is distilled. Ie. the principle applies in every situation. In the context of reading comprehension,
lends itself to fixed concepts.
But
tends to add logical complexity with a variety of related facts. So your interpretation relies more heavily on the immediate objective context.
Each way has its weakness.
For example, those who value
may completely ignore facts for the sake of their pet theories.
On the other hand, those who value
may dispense a pile of factual information that turns out to be wholly irrelevant.