Results 1 to 40 of 481

Thread: IR test (by Sol)

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    52
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    1. EII
    2. SEE
    3. LSE
    4. IEE
    5. LIE
    6. SLI
    7. LSI
    8. LII
    9. ESI
    10. ILI
    11. ILE
    12. IEI
    13. SLE
    14. ESE
    15. SEI
    16. EIE

    Interestygly I felt quite strong sympathy for the first five types automatically. And the most to SEE and EII. In the case of IEE, some of them rejected me a bit. Because they behaved as if they had ADHD. But these are just a few people, the rest arouse my sympathy. Fi group smiles are nice and look such natural ones and honest.
    The rest types is rather average and ok. I noticed a tendency not to like Fe types (Creative and Dominant). They seem as if they were doing it for show. They seem emotionally immature, artificial, insincere, sometimes even annoying. IEI is the most bearable. Most suppressed. EIE worst.... They intentionally behave as if they were doing something for the show. Some people are ok, but generally They behave as just clowning. The SEI facial expression is annoying. As for ILE and SLe, I was totally confused. For ILE a few people clowning and expression annoyed me. But otherwise the whole picture of this type was quite ok that. Some SLE are ok and some are not (Most). It was really hard to choose. And I could think about it for a long time. But I've already wasted enough time on it.....
    Last edited by NuclearWar666; 06-29-2020 at 03:40 PM.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,763
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    @NuclearWar666
    in top 3 Fi types + in bottom 3 Fe -> Te type, at least Te/Fi value. 4th types are Te at top and Ti at bottom, what supports the value too

    gamma-delta is rather possible
    mb excluded SEE/ILI, having suborderie and subrevisie at top

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    52
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    @NuclearWar666
    in top 3 Fi types + in bottom 3 Fe -> Te type, at least Te/Fi value. 4th types are Te at top and Ti at bottom, what supports the value too

    gamma-delta is rather possible
    mb excluded SEE/ILI, having suborderie and subrevisie at top
    It would look like this after deeper reflection. It's too hard to predict from 1 -16 which types I like best. So i did it like that. After that, I came to the conclusion that.

    1. EII and SEE
    2. LSE, IEE and LIE
    3. SLI, LSI and LII
    4. ILE and IEI
    5. ILI and ESI
    6. SLE and ESE
    7. SEI and EIE


    I think IEI and ILE are slightly better than ILI and ESI. Most ILI is be completely cold.... It is difficult to arouse sympathy for me. Although they look quite professional which is an advantage. Most ESI aretotally neuter again....
    But at least they don't annoy me as in the case of SLE or ESE or even more so EIE or SEI.
    Last edited by NuclearWar666; 07-04-2020 at 09:15 AM.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,763
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    @NuclearWar666

    Full sorting is more interesting, anyway.
    You have good chance to be Fi valued.
    Also. At top you had 3 Fi and at bottom 3 Fe, 4th were T types of same valued F. Besides Fi value (which is good possible), this may point on Te type. After ILI exclusion, as most possible types stay: LSE, LIE, SLI

    "I think I can be SLI. In the dichotomies covered result first ISTp, the next ISFj comes out. And from test always SLI. I just want to be more certain." (link)

    By IR test SLI is among most possible. There were 3 deltas at top.
    Having this match of different methods is a basis to pay more attention on SLI. Then LSE and LIE.

    You may make a video and place it in a typing thread or pm. Maybe this will add something.
    The only good way to be assured in your type is by IR effects with people IRL and their behavior. Them you'll need to type yourself by different methods, including tests.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    52
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've already recorded a video in a typing thread, but I was a little drunk then and I behaved somewhat differently than usually.

    Should I record another questionnaire? Or maybe just a short video?

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,763
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NuclearWar666 View Post
    I've already recorded a video in a typing thread, but I was a little drunk then and I behaved somewhat differently than usually.
    Typing video should be without alcohol.

    > Should I record another questionnaire? Or maybe just a short video?

    Another questionnaire is redundant. Video is useful for nonverbal info.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    52
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I was little stressed out by recording. So I decided to relieve my stress symptoms with alcohol.... It wasn't a good idea because I didn't come out naturally anyway. I made another movies (being sober - not drunk) and some expert in microexpressionein Vultology (Not I don't know as far as this theory has sense and how compatible with socionics, but he has stated that I am Jungian Ni-Te. And less probably Si-Te. Generally He can see gestures and facial expressions typical mainly for Te and for IXXP temperament.... He also found a lot for Fi... But he's not sure my type. Because he found signals typical of Ni-Se (more signals) and some for Si-Ne. I have received the entire report on this. I hope you understood my words. My English is not very good...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •