IR test (by Sol)

[Chae]

Make video, I'll say your type, you'll do IR test and ONLY then you'll get basis to decide about its quality.
Until you'll create typing theme with your video-interview, there are no reasons to discuss IR test with you. Your type may be other than you think.

> for heteros it's perfectly clear how it works

Works like I said: people of own sex are sorted lesser close to IR theory.

Nope! Robbie Rotten: out.

[ooo]

Yep Sol, you need to improve this, add some English videos and more varied scenes, it's boring to see most of those guys talking alone about god knows what... eheh, after 2 one is done!

[Sol]

you need to improve this, add some English videos

The language for nonverbal is not important, the words will only distract.

> and more varied scenes, it's boring to see most of those guys talking alone

Boring is caused by similar conditions - this helps easier to see the difference and to feel the common. Also you lesser distract on external stuff.

[Myst]

The language for nonverbal is not important, the words will only distract.

> and more varied scenes, it's boring to see most of those guys talking alone

Boring is caused by similar conditions - this helps easier to see the difference and to feel the common. Also you lesser distract on external stuff.

Is it a problem if I only watch one clip per example? You linked only one clip for each and it's not always easy to find a second one, apparently.

[Sol]

Is it a problem if I only watch one clip per example?

Any violation of recommendations is a problem. It will unpredictably reduce the validity of the testing.
I prefer to type with several clips by nonverbal info - it's based on my experience where impressions differ with lesser possibility with the more clips I saw. Here we have similar situation - you are using nonverbal for reading info related to a type.

> You linked only one clip for each and it's not always easy to find a second one, apparently.

Every link leads to a clip on a channel, - you may open other blogger's clip there. It's not so hard.

[Myst]

Any violation of recommendations is a problem. It will unpredictably reduce the validity of the testing.
I prefer to type with several clips by nonverbal info - it's based on my experience where impressions differ with lesser possibility with the more clips I saw. Here we have similar situation - you are using nonverbal for reading info related to a type.

> You linked only one clip for each and it's not always easy to find a second one, apparently.

Every link leads to a clip on a channel, - you may open other blogger's clip there. It's not so hard.

Eh, I ran into the issue of not finding another clip pretty early on. But I'll just skip the ones that don't have an easy to find 2nd clip, then.

And sure, I asked because I don't want to mess with the validity. (Not that I'm not skeptical but I don't mind trying to help with the project.)