only for SEE, as this is connected with weak Ne, and with unvalued this is especially tough to consider a lotbeing oblivious to motivations behind things
ethicals are as a rule easier to offend. Fi types especially if you do or say something that they personally don't like, hurt them or someone close to them, or if you have a rude and unpleasant attitude to peoplethe good thing is they are hard to offend
yes. criticism in valued functions are taken much more easily because of greater interest in dealing with those things, a feeling that those areas are naturally more important/better/more right for your life; criticism in weak, even valued, functions can result in ignoring behaviour or infantile rejection (they are weak, after all), but the weak valued variants of the functions elicit much more interest, give more often, when dealt with, inspiration and colour to life, are the most 'suggestive' to open influence. this is why correction from your dual or activator is more rarely frustrating, but correction from your conflictor or superego is not commonly met well (unless it's in small doses), even though the areas that are corrected are very similar, and improvement of a valued function should also improve the unvalued variant, as they work with the same data.i'm guessing you need to present it in a Te way